121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6652593)
1. Accuracy of registration of invasive cervical cancer.
Husted JA; Anderson TW; Gallagher R
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 129(12):1275-7. PubMed ID: 6652593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Problems in determining the incidence of cervical cancer.
Clarke EA; Hilditch S
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 129(12):1271-3. PubMed ID: 6652592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer and chronic disease surveillance in British Columbia.
Gallagher RP
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1977 Dec; 47():77-80. PubMed ID: 349402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rate of death from cervical cancer among native Indian women in British Columbia.
Band PR; Gallagher RP; Threlfall WJ; Hislop TG; Deschamps M; Smith J
CMAJ; 1992 Dec; 147(12):1802-4. PubMed ID: 1458421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invasive cervical cancer among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women--United States, 1992-1999.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2002 Nov; 51(47):1067-70. PubMed ID: 12500907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quality-control program for colposcopic practice.
Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Matisic JP; Miller DM
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):872-5. PubMed ID: 1923214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical cancers diagnosed at the Pasteur Institute of Madagascar from 1992 to 2002].
Raharisolo Vololonantenaina CR; Rabarijaona LP; Soares JL; Rasendramino M; Pécarrère JL; Khun H; Huerre M
Arch Inst Pasteur Madagascar; 2003; 69(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 15678821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent trends in recorded incidence and mortality from uterine cancer.
Gallagher RP; Elwood JM
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1982; 62():83-7. PubMed ID: 7167199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of cervical screening history data to interpret cervical cancer incidence trends.
Clare J; Edwards D; Bagnall H; Pearmain P; Lawrence G
J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Jun; 30(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 18296455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geographic & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in Kentucky, 1995-1999.
Wyatt S; Ross FE; Bottorff D; Lancaster M
J Ky Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 100(10):441-6. PubMed ID: 12395746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Earlier diagnosis of cervical cancer. An analysis of reports to the California tumor registry from 1942 to 1963.
Linden G; Dunn JE
Calif Med; 1966 Nov; 105(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 5957428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland.
Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 10929958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
