These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6653589)

  • 1. Sustained improvement in exercise tolerance following physiological cardiac pacing.
    Sutton R; Perrins EJ; Morley C; Chan SL
    Eur Heart J; 1983 Nov; 4(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 6653589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. M-mode echocardiograms for determination of optimal left atrial timing in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.
    Wish M; Gottdiener JS; Cohen AI; Fletcher RD
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 3341208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
    Dretzke J; Toff WD; Lip GY; Raftery J; Fry-Smith A; Taylor R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(2):CD003710. PubMed ID: 15106214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
    Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate and mid-term safety and efficacy of single lead VDD pacemakers for patients with atrioventricular block and normal sinus node function--a single centre experience.
    Tan JL; Hsu LF; Kam RM; Teo WS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jan; 32(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12625106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
    Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
    Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Senaratne J; Herath TT; Beaudette D; Irwin M; Gulamhusein S; Senaratne MP
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A clinical analysis of atrial-ventricular sequential pacing].
    Wang F; Sun R; Yu P
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1992 Feb; 20(1):19-21, 69. PubMed ID: 1396088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling in patients with DDD pacemakers].
    Iwase M; Yokota M; Takagi S; Hu XJ; Okada M; Kawai N; Hayashi H; Sotobata I; Murase M
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 3841903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Mitsuoka T; Kenny RA; Yeung TA; Chan SL; Perrins JE; Sutton R
    Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic basis for application of new pacemaker technology in sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.
    Sutton R; Citron P
    Br Heart J; 1979 May; 41(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 465231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers.
    Osswald S; Leiggener C; Buser PT; Pfisterer ME; Burckhardt D; Burkart F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 8774818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia].
    Drogaĭtsev AD
    Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of atrioventricular asynchrony on platelet activation: implication of thromboembolism in paced patients.
    Lau CP; Tse HF; Cheng G
    Heart; 1997 Oct; 78(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 9404251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permanent cardiac pacemakers. Indications and current trends.
    Kertes PJ
    Aust Fam Physician; 1990 Jul; 19(7):1066-70, 1072-6, 1078. PubMed ID: 2222298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables.
    Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological importance of different atrioventricular intervals to improved exercise performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.
    Haskell RJ; French WJ
    Br Heart J; 1989 Jan; 61(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2917098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.