These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6654959)
41. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Non--cloth-covered caged-ball prostheses. The second decade. Macmanus Q; Grunkemeier GL; Lambert LE; Starr A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 713585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical experience with the Lillehei-Kaster cardiac valve prosthesis. Mitha AS; Matisonn RE; le Roux BT; Chesler E J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Sep; 72(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 785108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Late results of isolated aortic valve replacement by Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Apropos of 596 cases]. Jegaden O; Llojeh K; Montagna P; Rossi R; Adeleine P; Delaye J; Delahaye JP; Mikaeloff P Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1991 Jan; 84(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 2012485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Four years' experience of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis. Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Takkunen J Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1976; 65(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 962274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements]. Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Valve replacement in children under twenty years of age. Experience with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Iyer KS; Reddy KS; Rao IM; Venugopal P; Bhatia ML; Gopinath N J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 6748715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position. Kaul TK; Mercer JL Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves. Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Double mitral and aortic valve replacement: 322 cases operated on between 1970 and 1985]. Mikaeloff P; Jegaden O; Rumolo A; Bonnefoy JY Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1988 Jan; 81(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 3130024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Early clinical experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve. Laczkovics A; Heidt M; Oelert H; Laufer G; Greve H; Pomar JL; Mohr FW; Haverich A; Birnbaum D; Regensburger D; Palatianos G; Wolner E J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 11206775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]