138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6655381)
1. Georgia Supreme Court invalidates involuntary sterilization statute.
Harper TD
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 Nov; 72(11):795-7. PubMed ID: 6655381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motes v. Hall County.
Georgia. Supreme Court
Rep Cases Decided Supreme Court State Ga Ga Supreme Court; 1983 Sep; 251():373-5. PubMed ID: 12041501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
Lombardo PA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The international medicolegal status of sterilization for mentally handicapped people.
Gonzales B
J Reprod Med; 1982 May; 27(5):257-8. PubMed ID: 7108860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute.
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent developments in the health care area.
Harper TD; Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization of the mentally retarded: a decision for the courts.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Aug; 11(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 6457815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
Chopko ME
Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law--due process--North Carolina compulsory sterilization statute held constitutional against challenge that it constituted an unlawful invasion of privacy.
Weathered F
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 8(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 11664735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Webster case: implications for Georgia physicians.
Harris AL
J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Sep; 78(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 2778409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive health care and minors' rights.
Paul EW; Klassel D
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 12339889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Grady: the mentally retarded individual's right to choose sterilization.
Lachance D
Am J Law Med; 1981; 6(4):559-90. PubMed ID: 7315845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
Murdock CW
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
