These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 665540)

  • 21. A validation study of a short-form hypnotic-experience questionnaire and its relationship to hypnotizability.
    Matheson G; Shue KL; Bart C
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1989 Jul; 32(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 2773816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding.
    Council JR; Kirsch I; Hafner LP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Jan; 50(1):182-9. PubMed ID: 3701572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding.
    Bowers KS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Oct; 40(4):253-75. PubMed ID: 1468834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Normative and psychometric characteristics of a Polish version of the Creative Imagination Scale.
    Siuta J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1987 Jan; 35(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3570565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the Phenomenology of consciousness inventory--hypnotic assessment procedure: a comment on pekala et al. (2010a, 2010b).
    Terhune DB; Cardeña E
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Oct; 53(2):109-17; discussion 119-32. PubMed ID: 21049744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hypnotic suggestibility and paranormal belief.
    Wagner MW; Ratzeburg FH
    Psychol Rep; 1987 Jun; 60(3 Pt 2):1069-70. PubMed ID: 3628640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hypnotic responsiveness: expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender.
    Green JP; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jan; 59(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 21104487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP; Fromm E; Lombard LS; Sossi M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effort and experience on the Creative Imagination Scale.
    McConkey KM; Sheehan PW
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1982 Jul; 30(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 7118319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A note of possible limitations on the use of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Levitt EE; Aronoff G; Morgan CD
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Jul; 22(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 4847203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring hypnotic responsiveness: a comparison of the Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A.
    Ruch JC; Morgan AH; Hilgard ER
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Oct; 22(4):365-76. PubMed ID: 4414606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trance state effects and imagery vividness before and during a hypnotic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Pekala RJ; Maurer R; Kumar VK; Elliott-Carter N; Mullen K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2010 Oct; 58(4):383-416. PubMed ID: 20799120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modifying hypnotic suggestibility with the Carleton Skills Training program.
    Bates BL; Miller RJ; Cross HJ; Brigham TA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Jul; 55(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 3418486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Carleton University responsiveness to suggestion scale: normative data and psychometric properties.
    Spanos NP; Radtke HL; Hodgins DC; Stam HJ; Bertrand LD
    Psychol Rep; 1983 Oct; 53(2):523-35. PubMed ID: 6647700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hypnotic depth and hypnotic susceptibility: a replicated finding.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1980 Jul; 28(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 7390667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comparison of Hypnotic Induction, Task Motivation, and a "Cold Start" Control Group on Hypnotizability.
    Krystek S; Kumar VK
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2016 Oct; 59(2):214-30. PubMed ID: 27586049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of overt and subjective responses to the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale under conditions of group administration.
    Spanos NP; Salas J; Menary EP; Brett PJ
    Psychol Rep; 1986 Jun; 58(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 3726039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "How deeply hypnotized did i get?" Predicting self-reported hypnotic depth from a phenomenological assessment instrument.
    Pekala RJ; Kumar VK; Maurer R; Elliott-Carter NC; Moon E
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2006 Jul; 54(3):316-39. PubMed ID: 16858905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships between imaginative ability variables and the Barber Suggestibility Scale.
    Spanos NP; McPeake JD; Churchill N
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1976 Jul; 19(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 937215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.