112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6656831)
1. Hysterectomy among women of reproductive age, United States, update for 1979-1980.
Sattin RW; Rubin GL; Hughes JM
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ; 1983 Aug; 32(3):1SS-7SS. PubMed ID: 6656831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An update on inpatient hysterectomy routes in the United States.
Desai VB; Xu X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):742-3. PubMed ID: 26226555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing indications for vaginal hysterectomy.
Porges RF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan; 136(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 7352495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.
Copenhaver EH
Surg Clin North Am; 1980 Apr; 60(2):437-49. PubMed ID: 6992307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The place and technic of vaginal hysterectomy in modern surgical gynecology].
Khubenov A; Ignatova S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1987; 26(5):45-9. PubMed ID: 3324787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysterectomy among women of reproductive age, United States, update for 1981-1982.
Irwin KL; Peterson HB; Hughes JM; Gill SW
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ; 1986; 35(1):1SS-6SS. PubMed ID: 3086700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.
Dicker RC; Greenspan JR; Strauss LT; Cowart MR; Scally MJ; Peterson HB; DeStefano F; Rubin GL; Ory HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Dec; 144(7):841-8. PubMed ID: 7148906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in Use and Outcomes of Women Undergoing Hysterectomy With Electric Power Morcellation.
Wright JD; Chen L; Burke WM; Hou JY; Tergas AI; Ananth CV; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2016 Aug 23-30; 316(8):877-8. PubMed ID: 27552622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy--the future is here and now].
Ben-Rafael Z; Orvieto R; Dicker D; Dekel A
Harefuah; 1996 Apr; 130(8):542-5. PubMed ID: 8765880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.
Hanstede MM; Burger MJ; Timmermans A; Burger MP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 22043840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993.
Lepine LA; Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Koonin LM; Morrow B; Kieke BA; Wilcox LS
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ; 1997 Aug; 46(4):1-15. PubMed ID: 9259214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Indications and methods of hysterectomy].
Németh G
Orv Hetil; 2014 Jul; 155(29):1152-7. PubMed ID: 25016447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends of Bilateral Salpingectomy During Vaginal Hysterectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Assistance Performed for Benign Indications in the United States.
Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Wyman A; Salihu HM; Imudia AN; Hart S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1063-1069.e1. PubMed ID: 27448507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative prevalence rates and corrected incidence rates of surgical sterilization among women in the United States, 1971--1978.
Nolan TF; Ory HW; Layde PM; Hughes JM; Greenspan JR
Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):776-81. PubMed ID: 7148803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy in the 21st century: different approaches, different challenges.
Brill AI
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 49(4):722-35. PubMed ID: 17082670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995-2018).
Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Cetinkaya Demir B; Gunaydin T; Uncu G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):791-798. PubMed ID: 31356889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
