These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6657744)

  • 1. Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of air kerma rate on threshold contrast in diagnostic fluoroscopy systems.
    Harrison RM; Day MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Nov; 28(11):1319-31. PubMed ID: 6657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
    McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
    Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.
    McCarthy D; Kenny P
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 94(1122):20201422. PubMed ID: 33956486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
    Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
    Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on DQE for various measurement conditions and X-ray units.
    Haba T; Kondo S; Hayashi D; Koyama S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 23649923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control.
    Reilly AJ; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):938-48. PubMed ID: 11675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.
    Ricciardello M; McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 7669021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy.
    Gagne RM; Quinn PW; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 8164575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy.
    Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filter material selection for region of interest radiologic imaging.
    Massoumzadeh P; Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9507475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approaches to interventional fluoroscopic dose curves.
    Wunderle KA; Rakowski JT; Dong FF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):342-352. PubMed ID: 26894349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.