These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6659917)
1. [TORP and PORP; plastipore - porcelain]. Gersdorff M; Andre M Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1983; 37(5):717-25. PubMed ID: 6659917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ossiculoplasty with composite prostheses. PORP and TORP. Goldenberg RA Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 27(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 7984372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of the clinical results obtained by means of Plastipore and ceramic ossicular prosthesis and bone allografts. Gersdorff MC; Maisin JP; Munting E Am J Otol; 1986 Jul; 7(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 3526913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porps, torps, and homografts in tympanoplasty. Gillanders DA; Cambon KG; Doyle PJ J Otolaryngol; 1980 Apr; 9(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 6990013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plastipore ossicular prostheses. A histological evaluation. Gamoletti R; Bellomi A; Sanna M; Zini C ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1984; 46(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6700961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of autograft and homograft TORP and PORP in the reconstruction of the conductive system in the middle ear. Betow C Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 4025531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of the clinical results obtained with plastipore and ceramic ossicular prostheses in otologic surgery. Gersdorff M; Andre M Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1986; 243(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 3707421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reconstruction of the ossicular chain: Plastipore prosthesis compared with autogenous and allogenic ossicles (author's transl)]. Hussl B; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Aug; 60(8):421-5. PubMed ID: 7346677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review. Six years experience of Plastipore. Kerr AI Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1984 Dec; 9(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 6532608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autologous fitted incus versus Plastipore PORP in ossicular chain reconstruction. Sanna M; Gamoletti R; Scandellari R; Delogu P; Magnani M; Zini C J Laryngol Otol; 1985 Feb; 99(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3973477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Histopathologic findings on proplast and plastipore prostheses]. Colletti V; Fiorino GF; Sittoni V Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1984; 4(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 6534054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ceravital versus plastipore in tympanoplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Mangham CA; Lindeman RC Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Feb; 99(2 Pt 1):112-6. PubMed ID: 2301864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Our experience with ossicular prostheses of Ceravital]. Gersdorff M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1985; 106(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 3834549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathological studies in the long-term evaluation of Plastipore prostheses. Tomoda K Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1985; 242(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 3904689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Our experience with biocompatible ossicle prostheses]. Mallea I; Marco J; Pérez Garrigues T An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1985; 12(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 4037263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]