These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6660263)

  • 1. Calibration of the Dicon Auto Perimeter 2000 compared with that of the Goldmann perimeter.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 96(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 6660263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship of visual threshold and reaction time to visual field eccentricity with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 11888543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode.
    Mills RP
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 6717919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.
    Phu J; Al-Saleem N; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
    J Vis; 2016 Nov; 16(14):5. PubMed ID: 27829104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Peritest, a new automatic and semi-automatic perimeter.
    Greve EL; Dannheim F; Bakker D
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Nov; 5(3):201-14. PubMed ID: 7152803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated perimetry: background, instruments and methods.
    Portney GL; Krohn MA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1978; 22(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 635771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of the Goldmann perimeter and accessories used in specific quantitative perimetry.
    Hansen E; Seim T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1978 Apr; 56(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 580843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning effect in automatic static perimetry with Dicon TKS 4000 computed perimeter.
    Konareva-Kostianeva M; Atanassov M
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(3B Suppl 3):34-7. PubMed ID: 10205990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Goldmann perimeter with high luminance chromatic targets.
    Lakowski R; Wright WD; Oliver K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jul; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 890591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry.
    Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.
    Wilscher S; Wabbels B; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 248(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 20232076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Free static threshold perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 186(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 3999619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A dissociation of thresholds between Goldmann kinetic perimetry and high-pass resolution perimetry in retinitis pigmentosa].
    Tokuhisa T; Oyama K; Tamaki R; Kitahara K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 96(11):1429-32. PubMed ID: 1476073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.