These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6660925)

  • 1. Prediction of the date of delivery during late pregnancy.
    Bernaschek G
    Arch Gynecol; 1983; 234(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 6660925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Determination of birth date by measuring the biparietal diameter of the fetal head].
    Japelj I; Saks A
    Lijec Vjesn; 1972 Dec; 94(12):603-10. PubMed ID: 4680688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age with the distal femoral and proximal tibial ossification centers in the third trimester.
    Goldstein I; Lockwood C; Belanger K; Hobbins J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 158(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 3276194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distal femoral epiphyses ossification center diameter and third trimester gestational age in Iranian population.
    Birang S; Ameri AA; Najmi Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 24505949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determination of the prospective time of labor using ultrasonic fetometry].
    Zanke S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(13):861-4. PubMed ID: 685569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of fetal age by echographic diagnosis of ossification centres in the fetal knee.
    Bernaschek G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():589-91. PubMed ID: 6400284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic age estimation via 3-T magnetic resonance imaging of ossification of the proximal tibial and distal femoral epiphyses: Use of a T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique.
    Ekizoglu O; Hocaoglu E; Inci E; Can IO; Aksoy S; Kazimoglu C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Mar; 260():102.e1-102.e7. PubMed ID: 26797254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic assessment of the distal femoral and proximal tibial ossification centers in the prediction of pulmonic maturity in normal women and women with diabetes.
    Goldstein I; Lockwood CJ; Reece EA; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 3293454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of biparietal diameter and femur length in the third trimester: effects of gestational age and variation in fetal growth.
    Wolfson RN; Peisner DB; Chik LL; Sokol RJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Mar; 5(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 3517362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Epiphyseal centers in the knee area - a sonographic and radiologic comparison].
    Bernaschek G; Bartl W; Wolf G
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1983; 187(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 6685949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Modification of echographically detectable epiphyseal centers by the sex, weight and length of the fetus].
    Bernaschek G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1983 Oct; 43(10):602-5. PubMed ID: 6557969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of fetal growth deviation by ultrasonic biometry. I. Methodology.
    Eik-Nes SH; Gröttum P; Persson PH; Marsál K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7090751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The importance of ultra-sound cephalometry for the prediction of the date of delivery--a contribution to the assessment of duration of pregnancy (author's transl)].
    Lieser H; Müller D; Tietze KW; Rathgen GH
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1975 Apr; 179(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 1154822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardization of sonar cephalometry and gestational age.
    Sabbagha RE; Hughey M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Oct; 52(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 714320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements.
    Benson CB; Doubilet PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Dec; 157(6):1275-7. PubMed ID: 1950881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experience with cephalometry in the determination of labor in diabetic pregnant women].
    Szalay VJ; Kun L; Somogyi J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1975; 97(14):871-4. PubMed ID: 1217242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femur length versus biparietal diameter for estimating gestational age in the third trimester.
    Egley CC; Seeds JW; Cefalo RC
    Am J Perinatol; 1986 Apr; 3(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 3516170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
    Wessel H; Nyberg T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of delivery date by ultrasound cephalometry.
    Varma TR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1973 Apr; 80(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 4704677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Determination of the gestational age in late pregnancy by sonography (author's transl)].
    Schillinger H; Müller R; Kretzschmar M; Wode J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jun; 36(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 939401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.