These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6662848)
41. [Renal digital angiography in the study of hypertensive patients]. Luria X; Lora F; Rams A; Roca-Cusachs A; Alexander C An Med Interna; 1990 May; 7(5):237-42. PubMed ID: 2102718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The role of intravenous urography in hypertension. Webb JA; Talner LB Radiol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 17(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 472196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Hypertensive urogram: a nondiscriminatory test for renovascular hypertension. Thornbury JR; Stanley JC; Fryback DG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 6976710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Urography in hypertension. Practical consequences of recent information]. Gudmundsen TE; Pedersen HK; Ostensen H; Pape JF Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Dec; 106(34-36):3012-3. PubMed ID: 3810627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Digital subtraction angiography and its application in children. Capitanio MA; Faerber EN; Gainey MA; Wolfson BJ Pediatr Clin North Am; 1985 Dec; 32(6):1449-60. PubMed ID: 3906533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Relative morphological renovascular index parameters in the diagnosis of arterial hypertension (author's transl)]. Szmigielski W Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1979; 43(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 547271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Digital subtraction arteriography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Campbell DR; Mason WF; Flemming BK; Fraser DB J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 6365924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Numerical angiography in the evaluation of arterial hypertension]. Seurot M; Sirinelli D; Colombel B; Ménard J; Corvol P; Gaux JC J Radiol; 1983; 64(8-9):495-500. PubMed ID: 6358485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension: are i.v. digital subtraction angiography and the excretory urograms really outdated compared to captopril renography? Fournier A; Makdassi R; Remond A; Sevestre MA; Clesper PI Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Jun; 11(6):1186-7. PubMed ID: 8966007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Is it still necessary to detect, and when the how, renovascular hypertension in 1980? Or, the indications for arterial time in intravenous urography]. Fournier A Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1980; 131(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 7447226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Digital vascular imaging in children. A preliminary report. Laurin S; Hawskin IF; Hudson TM Rofo; 1984 Mar; 140(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 6423478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Evaluation of intravenous pyelography combined with the wash out test using furosemidum in the diagnosis of hypertensive disease]. Gao SL Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1986 Apr; 20(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 2942364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Digital subtraction angiography. Stanson AW Mayo Clin Proc; 1982 Nov; 57(11):725-7. PubMed ID: 6752593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Renovascular hypertension: a non-invasive Duplex scanning screening. Ferretti G; Salomone A; Castagno PL; Miglietti P; Rispoli P Int Angiol; 1988; 7(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 3058832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Renal angioplasty: current status. Tegtmeyer CJ; Kofler TJ; Ayers CA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jan; 142(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 6229167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]