These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Visual masking with presentations in same and opposite visual fields: evidence for contralateral masking. Saccuzzo DP; Michael BE; Rowe R Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 7133895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact. Fein G; Brown FF J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1987 Apr; 9(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 3558749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Backward contralateral masking by light and by random pattern. Jarvis B; Vormbrock J; Saccuzzo DP Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6622151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking. Hellige JB; Walsh DA; Lawrence VW; Prasse M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 528933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemispheric asymmetry for face recognition: some effects of visual masking, hemiretinal stimulation and learning task. Proudfoot RE Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 7088271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of stimulus degradation on letter-matching performance of left and right hemispheric stroke patients. Wolcott CL; Saul RE; Hellige JB; Kumar S J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Mar; 12(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 2341552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Asymmetry of visual perception]. Kostandov EA; Reshchikova TN; Shostakovich GS; Genkina OA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 899258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries. Robertson LC; Lamb MR Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye. Westendorf DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 2527957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers. Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking. Jordan TR; Bevan KM Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A longitudinal study of the development of visual field advantage for letter matching. Davidoff JB; Done DJ Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 6462425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli. Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lateralization of peripherally and centrally masked words in young and elderly people. Byrd M; Moscovitch M J Gerontol; 1984 Nov; 39(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 6491181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking. Zamansky HS; Corwin TR Perception; 1976; 5(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 951170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]