These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6664679)

  • 1. How effective is perimetry in current practice?
    Trobe JD
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1380-3. PubMed ID: 6664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Shuster JJ; Krischer JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 Nov; 90(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 7446646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A screening method for chiasmal visual-field defects.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC; Krischer JP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Feb; 99(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 7469863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry.
    Sanabria O; Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2023737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.
    Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of healthy volunteers to simulate a neurologic field defect on automated perimetry.
    Ghate D; Bodnarchuk B; Sanders S; Deokule S; Kedar S
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar; 121(3):759-62. PubMed ID: 24314835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery of visual fields in brain-lesioned patients by reaction perimetry treatment.
    Schmielau F; Wong EK
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 4():31. PubMed ID: 17705848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm for visual fields.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1980; 24(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 7414506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients.
    Gedik S; Akman A; Akova YA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 91(8):1065-9. PubMed ID: 17301122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structure-Function Correlation in Hemianopic Vision Loss in Children Aged 3-6 Years Using OCT and SVOP, and Comparison with Adult Eyes.
    Bowl W; Knobloch R; Schweinfurth S; Holve K; Stieger K; Lorenz B
    Ophthalmic Res; 2018; 60(4):221-230. PubMed ID: 29332093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 May; 89(5):731-41. PubMed ID: 7377271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the current oculokinetic perimetry chart be improved?
    Chia WL; Goldberg I
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 10571391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with the Fieldmaster perimeter.
    Bobrow JC; Drews RC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 93(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 7065096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
    Schindler S; McCrary JA
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.