These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6665240)

  • 1. [Renal contrast radiography study in hypertensive patients: comparison of the nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Mannella P; Tataranni G; Benea G; Logallo G; Farinelli A
    Radiol Med; 1983 Jun; 69(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 6665240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in selective renovasography].
    Porst H; Mayer R; Clauss W
    Urologe A; 1986 Mar; 25(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 3521047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proteinuria following nephroangiography. VII. Comparison between ionic monomeric, monoacidic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media in the dog.
    Törnquist C; Almén T; Golman K; Holtås S
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():49-52. PubMed ID: 6267893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the side effects of urographic contrast media (iothalamate, diatrizoate, iodamide, iopamidol) within the scope of a CT study].
    Stellamor K; Hruby W; Assinger S; Luckner H
    Radiologe; 1984 Oct; 24(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 6505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Increase of kidney enzymes in urine after administration of contrast media: comparison of the nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic substances].
    Tschakert H; Matern-Pinzek R; Schaffeldt J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 May; 5(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 7605811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between isteropac and a new non-ionic contrast medium for hysterosalpingography (B-15000)].
    Valentini AL; De Vivo D; Danza FM; La Vecchia G; Vincenzoni M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):308-10. PubMed ID: 3520708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Disturbance of cardiac rhythm during intravenous urography].
    Di Piazza V; Gussetti P
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1985; 33(7-8):421-4. PubMed ID: 4080176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Enzyme determination in the urine for the evaluation of kidney tolerance of the water-soluble roentgen contrast medium iopamidol].
    Hartmann HG; Jutzler GA; Bambauer R; Keller HE; Maruhn D
    Radiologe; 1984 Sep; 24(9):442-5. PubMed ID: 6494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnostic effectiveness and safety of currently available X-ray contrast media].
    Sergeev PV; Sviridov NK; Poliaev IuA; Shimanovskiĭ NL
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1999; (6):45-9. PubMed ID: 10714233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New contrast media for angiography (Telebrix, Hexabrix) (author's transl)].
    Bohutová J; Kolár J; Karmazin V; Stupáková Z
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1981; 120(50):1527-30. PubMed ID: 7326714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of iopamidol with three other contrast media in orbital venography/cavernous sinography.
    Macpherson P
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jul; 55(655):539-40. PubMed ID: 7150905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Iopamidol compared with Isopaque Cerebral in angiography of the lower extremities].
    Aspestrand F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1984 Nov; 104(31):2164-5. PubMed ID: 6397873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Jopamidol, a non-ionic x-ray contrast medium--tolerance from a neurological viewpoint].
    Aichner F; Bauer G; Gerstenbrand F; Pallua A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1983 Jan; 95(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 6858170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of an ionic (ioglicinate) with a non-ionic (iohexol) contrast medium in renal computed tomography].
    Weigert F; Hartmann A; Rohde U
    Rontgenpraxis; 1986 May; 39(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 3523788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of safety and tolerance of iopamidol in peripheral arteriography.
    Mills SR; Wertman DE; Heaston DK; Moore AV; Bates M; Allen S; Rommel AJ; Thompson WM
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 7122897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of non-ionic contrast media in vascular applications.
    Malott JC; Fodor J
    Radiol Technol; 1984; 56(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6390518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
    Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.