These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6665912)

  • 21. Coexistence of pregnancy and cancer.
    Jacobs IA; Chang CK; Salti GI
    Am Surg; 2004 Nov; 70(11):1025-9. PubMed ID: 15586520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: results of a multicenter retrospective Korean study (KGOG-1006).
    Lee JM; Lee KB; Kim YT; Ryu HS; Kim YT; Cho CH; Namkoong SE; Lee KH; Choi HS; Kim KT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 198(1):92.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17905175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Round table: Carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
    Escudero P; Saavedra R; Martínez L; Salas O; Morales E; González J
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1982; 47(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 6927318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malignancies among women who gave birth after in vitro fertilization.
    Källén B; Finnström O; Lindam A; Nilsson E; Nygren KG; Olausson PO
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Jan; 26(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 21088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Frequency and follow-up of non-negative cervical smears in the counties of Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm in 1979-1989].
    Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz HB; Thommesen N
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jan; 155(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 8430472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
    Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical mass screening in Norway--510,000 smears a year.
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7867019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Viral condylomata of the cervix].
    Ruiz Moreno JA; García Gómez R; Alonso de Ruiz P
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Mar; 52(323):63-8. PubMed ID: 6489795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Review of 9,366 vaginal cytological examinations at the Department of Education and Medical Research of the Cowdray American-British Hospital].
    de Larios NM; Rubio Lotvin B; Ruíz Moreno JA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Mar; 39(233):217-22. PubMed ID: 1261853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Invasive cervical cancer in pregnancy.
    Cohen S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 May; 36(2):228. PubMed ID: 8798329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
    Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
    Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Endoscopic study methods in the diagnosis of the initial forms of cervical cancer in pregnant women].
    Garmanova NV; Dekster LI; Urmancheeva AF; Iudkovskaia IL; Bokhman IaV
    Vopr Onkol; 1981; 27(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 7222527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cytological diagnosis of cervico-uterine cancer in pregnant and puerperal women].
    Chuaqui R; Quintana ME; Pérez A; Verni J; Duarte I
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 7659814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.