These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 666652)
1. Clinical rationale for using an overhead speaker in evaluation of hearing aids. Mueller HG; Sweetow RW Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Jul; 104(7):417-8. PubMed ID: 666652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of various front-to-back ratios on the performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Mueller HG; Johnson RM J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 511656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing aid measurements using the revised standard: reducing variability and determining test system accuracy. Townsend TH J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 23(2):322-35. PubMed ID: 7442193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral digital hearing aids for binaural hearing. Kimberley BP; Dymond R; Gamer A Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 8205979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multivariate strategy for prediction of psychoacoustic performance from electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids. Smaldino J J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 528289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Communication strategies used by individuals with moderate sensorineural hearing loss]. de Mello JM; Oliveira JR; Dell'Aringa AH; Oliveira VV; Zacare CC Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 15109114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimated variability of real-ear insertion response (REIR) due to loudspeaker type and placement. Stone MA; Moore BC Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 15357410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Directional hearing aid based on array technology. Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Directional microphone in hearing aids. Effects on speech discrimination in noise. Sung GS; Sung RJ; Angelelli RM Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 May; 101(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 1131090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing aid evaluation. Clinical experience with a new philosophy. Jerger J; Hayes D Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Apr; 102(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 1267705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise and hearing loss. Rose DE Postgrad Med; 1981 Aug; 70(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 7255292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of digital technology on the selection and fitting of hearing aids. Hecox KE; Punch JL Am J Otol; 1988 Dec; 9 Suppl():77-85. PubMed ID: 3059815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids]. Welzl-Müller K; Sattler K HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selecting the gain for radio microphone (FM) systems: theoretical considerations and practical limitations. Rowson VJ; Bamford JM Br J Audiol; 1995 Jun; 29(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 8574202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of a conventional versus a nonoccluding (cros-type) earmold upon the frequency response of a hearing aid. Green DS; Ross M J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Sep; 11(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 5722491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. Dempsey JJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Achieving prescribed gain/frequency responses with advances in hearing aid technology. Sammeth CA; Preves DA; Bratt GW; Peek BF; Bess FH J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8263820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]