These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6667107)

  • 1. Psychometric differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.
    Martin LM; Rodgers DA; Montague DK
    Arch Sex Behav; 1983 Dec; 12(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 6667107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory as a discriminator of primary organic and primary psychogenic impotence in diabetic males.
    Jefferson TW; Glaros A; Spevack M; Boaz TL; Murray FT
    Arch Sex Behav; 1989 Apr; 18(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2712688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological screening of impotence with Finney's MMPI-derived Impotence Scale.
    Craig RJ; Cannon B; Olson RE
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):1019-26. PubMed ID: 8559904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MMPI and MIT discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.
    Beutler LE; Karacan I; Anch AM; Salis PJ; Scott FB; Williams RL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1975 Dec; 43(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 1194483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MMPI evaluation of erectile dysfunction: failure of organic vs. psychogenic decision rules.
    Levenson H; Olkin R; Herzoff N; deLancy M
    J Clin Psychol; 1986 Sep; 42(5):752-4. PubMed ID: 3760207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination between psychogenic and organic erectile dysfunction.
    Speckens AE; Hengeveld MW; Lycklama à Nijeholt GA; van Hemert AM; Hawton KE
    J Psychosom Res; 1993; 37(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 8463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial development of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales to identify patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.
    Locke DE; Thomas ML
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Mar; 33(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 21069613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric assessment of diabetic impotence.
    Watkins SE; Williams P; Ryder RE; Bowshier W
    Br J Psychiatry; 1993 Jun; 162():840-2. PubMed ID: 8330118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the male function profile/impotence questionnaire.
    Fineman KR; Rettinger HI
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1151-75. PubMed ID: 1924615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in the epilepsy monitoring unit.
    Locke DE; Kirlin KA; Wershba R; Osborne D; Drazkowski JF; Sirven JI; Noe KH
    Epilepsy Behav; 2011 Aug; 21(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 21733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of organic versus psychogenic impotence with the DSFI.
    Derogatis LR; Meyer JK; Dupkin CN
    J Sex Marital Ther; 1976; 2(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 1011272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of Eysenck's neuroticism dimension within the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in patients with duodenal ulcer. The Hvidovre Ulcer Project Group.
    Jess P; Bech P
    Psychother Psychosom; 1994; 62(3-4):168-75. PubMed ID: 7846260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the urological assessment in impotence: findings with a new diagnostic rating scale.
    Condra M; Morales A; Surridge D; Marshall P; Fenemore J
    J Urol; 1984 Mar; 131(3):486-90. PubMed ID: 6699987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A manifest anxiety scale from the MMPI-168.
    King MG; Campbell IM
    J Clin Psychol; 1986 Sep; 42(5):748-51. PubMed ID: 3760206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory profile.
    Griffith NM; Szaflarski JP; Schefft BK; Isaradisaikul D; Meckler JM; McNally KA; Privitera MD
    Epilepsy Behav; 2007 Aug; 11(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 17602880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impotence].
    Kockott G
    Urologe A; 1986 Mar; 25(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 3716044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theoretical and technical problems in the measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence for the differential diagnosis of impotence.
    Wasserman MD; Pollak CP; Spielman AJ; Weitzman ED
    Psychosom Med; 1980 Nov; 42(6):575-85. PubMed ID: 7465743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative investigations in 26 impotent and 26 nonimpotent diabetic patients.
    Buvat J; Lemaire A; Buvat-Herbaut M; Guieu JD; Bailleul JP; Fossati P
    J Urol; 1985 Jan; 133(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 3155475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Psychogenic erectile impotence].
    Grünfeld B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Apr; 108(11):839-42. PubMed ID: 3376062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unreliability of nocturnal penile tumescence recording and MMPI profiles in assessment of impotence.
    Marshall P; Morales A; Surridge D
    Urology; 1981 Feb; 17(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 7467014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.