These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6668304)

  • 21. [Use of blue and green systems of image visualization in roentgenology].
    Riuduger IuG
    Med Tekh; 2004; (6):40-5. PubMed ID: 15656416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity, resolution and contrast of film-screen combinations.
    Paix D; Holloway AF
    Australas Radiol; 1985 Feb; 29(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 4004671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The clinical evaluation of cephalograms using the single screen/single emulsion film system for improving image quality].
    Tanimoto K; Yamada K; Kodera Y; Imagawa H; Yoneda H; Sunayashiki T; Ogawa M; Wada T; Yamauchi K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Mar; 45(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 3458848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Sensitivity figures for film-screen combinations for medical diagnosis].
    He G; Hoeschen D; Mirandé W
    Rofo; 1982 Dec; 137(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 6218053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [New realities in the modern X-ray technology].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 14603840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    McNicol A; Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Physical and psychophysical criteria for the evaluation of the quality of radiographic images].
    Borasi G; Delpiano S; Landini A; Orsini S; Papagni L; Tosi G
    Radiol Med; 1982 May; 68(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 7111792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
    Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
    Patrux C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.