These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6670824)

  • 21. In vitro testing for the risk of arachnoiditis from myelographic contrast media.
    Cheung HS; Johansen JG; Haughton VM; Nichols TR
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Aug; 20(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 4044192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Biochemical aspects of adverse reactions to contrast material].
    Shirakata A; Naoi Y; Tanaka T; Takahashi H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Nov; 47(11):1489-501. PubMed ID: 2833720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Experience of iopamidol in peripheral arteriography].
    Tajima H; Kumazaki T; Iri N; Ohya T; Ariga K; Sugawara K; Ohmigawa H; Miyashita T; Sawano S; Hosoi S
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1983 Dec; 28(13):1557-61. PubMed ID: 6674607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast media induced pulmonary edema. Comparison of ionic and nonionic agents in an animal model.
    Måre K; Violante M; Zack A
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 6511265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of the effects of ionic vs non-ionic contrast media on the venous endothelium. Scanning electron microscopic observations.
    Morettin LB
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):22-4. PubMed ID: 3726193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Non-ionic contrast media].
    Wójtowicz JS
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1985 Dec 23-30; 40(51-52):1476-8. PubMed ID: 3913946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of non-ionic, water soluble, low-osmolality contrast media (iopamidol) in abdominal angiography].
    Matsuo N; Uchida H; Oishi H; Kinoshita U; Nakagawa F; Hirai T; Murata T; Yoshioka H; Katsuragi M; Oue S
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1984 Apr; 29(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 6471501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Animal experiment study for evaluation of endothelial damage to the aorta after contrast medium administration by ioxithalamate and iomeprol. Quantitative detection of increased cell proliferation with autoradiography].
    Gabelmann A; Weyrich G; Aurich M; Haberstroh J; Freudenberg N; Langer M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jan; 48(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 7871436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Pharmacological study of a new angiographic contrast agent. I. Toxicity. Elimination].
    Cheymol G; Guerbet M; Tilly G
    Therapie; 1971; 26(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 5113811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Use of non-ionogenic contrast media for myelography].
    Sviridov NK; Popova ZP; Varfolomeeva VN
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1984; (4):50-3. PubMed ID: 6388202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of iopamidol in coronary angiography in the rabbit.
    Grönvall J; Hegedüs V; Grande P; Henningsen J
    Eur J Radiol; 1982 Feb; 2(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 7084252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparative study of 2 contrast media with low osmolarity in pediatric angiocardiography].
    Hoeffel JC; Donze B; Worms AM; Lostette Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):712-3. PubMed ID: 6367613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Urographic excretion studies with nonionic contrast agents. Iopamidol vs. iothalamate.
    Wilcox J; Evill CA; Sage MR; Benness GT
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 6862812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of high- and low-osmolar contrast media on renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate in euvolaemic and dehydrated rats. A comparison between ioxithalamate, iopamidol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
    Nygren A; Ulfendahl HR
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 2775601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The rate of adverse reactions to contrast media after double injections--correlation with the plasma histamine level].
    Tschakert H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1989 Apr; 42(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2652339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate].
    Tajima H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development, chemistry, and physical properties of iopamidol and its analogues.
    Pitrè D; Felder E
    Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(6 Suppl):S301-9. PubMed ID: 7203940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advantages of non-ionic contrast media in vascular applications.
    Malott JC; Fodor J
    Radiol Technol; 1984; 56(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6390518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acute damage to human endothelial cells by brief exposure to contrast media in vitro.
    Laerum F
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):681-4. PubMed ID: 6844604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.