136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6671323)
21. Role of Surgical Versus Clinical Staging in Chemoradiated FIGO Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Patients-Acute Toxicity and Treatment Quality of the Uterus-11 Multicenter Phase III Intergroup Trial of the German Radiation Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Cancer Group.
Marnitz S; Martus P; Köhler C; Stromberger C; Asse E; Mallmann P; Schmidberger H; Affonso Júnior RJ; Nunes JS; Sehouli J; Budach V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Feb; 94(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 26853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program.
Lowe MP; Bahador A; Muderspach LI; Burnett A; Santos L; Caffrey A; Roman LD; Morrow CP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 16962520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Lower Extremity Edema in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Pretreatment Laparoscopic Surgical Staging with Tailored Radiotherapy Versus Primary Radiotherapy.
Kim SI; Lim MC; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Seo SS; Kang S; Yoo CW; Nam BH; Kim JY; Chung SH; Park SY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 26059654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical and operative staging of cervical cancer.
Hacker NF
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Dec; 2(4):747-59. PubMed ID: 3067942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Treatment of cervical carcinoma. Prognostic factors in patients with surgical treatment].
Iwasaka T
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Oct; 62 Suppl 10():225-9. PubMed ID: 15535240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Controversies on the staging of microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
Di Leo S; Caragliano L; Cassaro N; Meli MT; Consalvo P; Caschetto S
Minerva Ginecol; 2000 Sep; 52(9):345-9. PubMed ID: 11189964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Prognostic factors in gynecologic cancer].
Yajima A; Sato S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Aug; 15(8):2209-15. PubMed ID: 3408255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The definition of stage IA(1) cervical adenocarcinoma and selection criteria for nonradical surgical management.
Schorge JO; Lee KR; Sheets EE
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 May; 77(2):339-40. PubMed ID: 10785493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical treatment and outcome of early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (FIGO stage IA1).
Yahata H; Sonoda K; Yasunaga M; Ohgami T; Kawano Y; Kaneki E; Okugawa K; Kaku T; Kato K
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):e50-e53. PubMed ID: 28429457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Management decision making using clinical and operative staging in cervical cancer.
Monaghan JM
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Dec; 2(4):737-46. PubMed ID: 3067941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discrepancies between clinical staging and surgicopathologic findings in early-stage cervical cancer and prognostic significance.
Chen C; Zhang W; Liu P; Su G; Gong S; Li W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jun; 145(3):287-292. PubMed ID: 30903619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer staging, pretreatment planning, and surgical treatment in the Nordic countries-Survey from the Surgical Subcommittee of the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology.
Fuglsang K; Haldorsen IS; Avall-Lundqvist E; Lindahl G; Roed H; Woie K; Pakarinen P; Thoroddsen A; Anttila M; Blaakaer J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Oct; 97(10):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 29799176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix by surgery alone].
Dargent D; Rudigoz RC; Audra P; Adelline P
Biomed Pharmacother; 1985; 39(8):414-21. PubMed ID: 3914911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Hematometra in patients with cervical cancer--its CT presentation and clinical significance].
Hsu SM; Pan HB; Kan YY; Chang JM; Yang CF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Feb; 51(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 8385551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
