BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6671392)

  • 1. Directional scanning or reporting preferences are not the cause of visual hemifield x report interactions.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Cortex; 1983 Dec; 19(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 6671392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on the interpretation of lateral asymmetries in the naming of words and line drawings.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 6626941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and storage of line drawings presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres of adults and children.
    Young AW; Bion PJ
    Cortex; 1981 Oct; 17(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 7333121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Possible effects of forced report order on tachistoscopic recognition of bilaterally presented stimuli: a response to Young and Ellis.
    Levine SC; Banich MT
    Brain Lang; 1984 Mar; 21(2):364-74. PubMed ID: 6704708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of superiority of the right visual field in bilateral tachistoscopic word-recognition.
    Fudin R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 pt. 1):683-8. PubMed ID: 1012856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual hemifield asymmetry for naming concrete nouns and verbs in children between seven and eleven years of age.
    Ellis AW; Young AW
    Cortex; 1981 Dec; 17(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 7344826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Recognition of visual images by separate hemispheres in conditions of masked blocking of interhemispheric transmission].
    Glezer VD; Nevskaia AA; Chernova ND; Gauzel'man VE
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Oct; 89(10):1177-83. PubMed ID: 14758642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of type of center fixation stimulus on visual-field preferences: a preliminary study.
    Moore WH; Snow KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 6634317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetries in the perception of facial affect: is there an influence of reading habits?
    Vaid J; Singh M
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(10):1277-87. PubMed ID: 2594174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sorting of hemifield presented temporal and spatial stimuli.
    Brandeis R; Babkoff H
    Cortex; 1984 Jun; 20(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 6744890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli.
    Nachshon I
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Jan; 25(3-4):161-74. PubMed ID: 3884523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemifield differences for naming bilaterally presented nouns varying on age of acquisition.
    Young AW; Bion PJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Apr; 50(2):366. PubMed ID: 7375284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Position response bias in visual field recognition.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1984 Jun; 20(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 6744900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in the initial letter acuity hypothesis.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 1987 Jul; 31(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 3620908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the nature of the left visual field advantage for faces.
    Anderson E; Parkin AJ
    Cortex; 1985 Sep; 21(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 4053630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative attensity of stimuli in left and right visual hemifields.
    Kirssin JE; Harcum ER
    Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Jun; 24(3):807-22. PubMed ID: 5622770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemifield differences in binocular fusion.
    Carmon A; Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 4686707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language and task effects on lateralized word recognition.
    Melamed F; Zaidel E
    Brain Lang; 1993 Jul; 45(1):70-85. PubMed ID: 8353731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.