These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6671911)

  • 21. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analytical support for acetabular component metal backing.
    Crowninshield RD; Pedersen DR; Brand RA; Johnston RC
    Hip; 1983; ():207-15. PubMed ID: 6671910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reinforcement of PMMA bone cement with a continuous wire coil--a 3D finite element study.
    Frigstad JR; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):429-39. PubMed ID: 9138653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periacetabular stress distributions after joint replacement with subchondral bone retention.
    Carter DR; Vasu R; Harris WH
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1983 Feb; 54(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 6829279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Contribution to the study of pelvic stress during weight-bearing. Role of the pubic branch and trabecular bone].
    Fabeck L; Descamps PY; Bourgois R; Dhem A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7899636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Plastic surgery of post-traumatic marginal defects of the acetabulum].
    Fadeev OV; Rabov VK; Ovchinnikova NM; Zhadenov II; Kovaleva ID; Sumin IuG
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1990 Jan; 144(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 2165337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design rationale of a small ingrowth acetabular component: two to three years' results.
    Cameron HU
    Contemp Orthop; 1992 Jan; 24(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10149937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element analysis of acetabular wear. Validation, and backing and fixation effects.
    Maxian TA; Brown TD; Pedersen DR; McKellop HA; Lu B; Callaghan JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):111-7. PubMed ID: 9372763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Dissociation of the acetabular metallic inlay of a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty].
    Cazenave A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 18555867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pelvic stresses in vitro--II. A study of the efficacy of metal-backed acetabular prostheses.
    Finlay JB; Bourne RB; Landsberg RP; Andreae P
    J Biomech; 1986; 19(9):715-25. PubMed ID: 3793746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Technology of finite-element analysis and its application in the field of acetabular prosthesis].
    Ma WH; Zhang XM; Wang JF
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2011 Apr; 24(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 21604540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The formation of stress by acrylic bone cements during fixation of the acetabular prosthesis.
    Holm NJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1980 Oct; 51(5):719-26. PubMed ID: 7468165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.