These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6674666)

  • 1. [The effects of spatial arrangement upon selective letter perception].
    Watanabe I
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1983 Jun; 54(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 6674666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of noise letters upon selective identification of letters].
    Watanabe I
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1985 Aug; 56(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 4068394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inducing letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.
    Fiset D; Gosselin F; Blais C; Arguin M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 16989548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Cha KH; Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interdependence of spatial attention and lexical access as revealed by early asymmetries in occipito-parietal ERP activity.
    Dell'Acqua R; Pesciarelli F; Jolicoeur P; Eimer M; Peressotti F
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 17371492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and restitution of visual function in a case of cerebral amblyopia.
    Rentschler I; Baumgartner G; Campbell FW; Lehmann D
    Hum Neurobiol; 1982 Mar; 1(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 7185784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. fMRI correlates of cortical specialization and generalization for letter processing.
    Joseph JE; Cerullo MA; Farley AB; Steinmetz NA; Mier CR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):806-20. PubMed ID: 16750396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Klein RM; Roy-Charland A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1191-210. PubMed ID: 14640838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive mechanisms of visuomotor transformation in movement imitation: examining predictions based on models of apraxia and motor control.
    Gravenhorst RM; Walter CB
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 19473740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnocellular involvement in flanked-letter identification relates to the allocation of attention.
    Omtzigt D; Hendriks AW
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1927-40. PubMed ID: 15145686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online response preparation in a rapid serial visual search task.
    Miller J; Schröter H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1364-90. PubMed ID: 12542133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.