These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6677636)

  • 1. The effects of short-term auditory masking on fundamental frequency variability.
    Rastatter M; Rivers C
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 6677636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults.
    Rivers C; Rastatter MP
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jan; 25(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 3836994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on primary stressing during spontaneous speech.
    Colcord RD; Loren CA; Rastatter M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1217-8. PubMed ID: 3808897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on variability of fundamental frequency during highly similar productions of spontaneous speech.
    Loren CA; Colcord RD; Rastatter MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1203-6. PubMed ID: 3808895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1495-9. PubMed ID: 19739762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
    Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The mapping of the masking effect of noise in relation to the adaptive potentials of the auditory analyzer for speech communication].
    Tsaneva L
    Probl Khig; 1994; 19():65-71. PubMed ID: 7845994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fundamental frequency histograms measured by electroglottography during speech: a pilot study for standardization.
    Kania RE; Hartl DM; Hans S; Maeda S; Vaissiere J; Brasnu DF
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 15979277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological significance of the zoning of the masking effect of noise, related to the adaptive capacities of the auditory analyzer for speech communication.
    Tzaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):291-2. PubMed ID: 9919380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.
    Ziegler JC; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Lorenzi C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):732-45. PubMed ID: 19702766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.