301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6678996)
1. [Results of prospective cytological diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Saks A; Kodric T; Novak S; Vlaisavljević V
Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1983; 23(5-6):103-6. PubMed ID: 6678996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].
Kazadi Buanga J; Acosta Vazquez MJ
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Dec; 89(12):602-5. PubMed ID: 7846467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate cervical diagnostic studies: a necessity for individualized treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix.
Scott RB
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1969 Jul; 24(7 Pt 2):985-92. PubMed ID: 5212443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The validation of cervical cytology. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
Soost HJ; Lange HJ; Lehmacher W; Ruffing-Kullmann B
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 1994641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical pathology.
Macfarlan SM; Cowgill JS; Appel TB
Rocky Mt Med J; 1979; 76(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 523895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparison of cytological and histological studies on women with a colposcopically atypical cervix uteri].
Zamfirova K; Zlatkov V; Makaveeva V
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 2091471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the predictability of residual disease in the uterus from microscopic study of cone biopsy margins.
Linasmita V
J Med Assoc Thai; 1988 Mar; 71 Suppl 1():102-5. PubMed ID: 3418255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of cryosurgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Javaheri G; Balin M; Meltzer RM
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 58(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 7243149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with diagnosis and management of pre and early cancers of the cervix.
Saraiya U; Garud M; Mehtaji S; Fernandes W
Int Surg; 1978 Feb; 63(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 632017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Kern Wh; Zivolich MR
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 269601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Local treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with a 5 percent fluorouracil ointment].
Barten G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(24):1510-6. PubMed ID: 3442159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
Parker A; Ueki M
N Z Med J; 1986 Jun; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear.
Gordon H
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
