117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6679550)
1. Effect of a contralateral masking stimulus on auditory response performance.
Sagharichi M; Fulton RT
J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):77-93. PubMed ID: 6679550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of effect of contralateral speech discourse on auditory threshold response behavior.
Fulton RT; Meyer PA; Cooper SJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 7187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Level dependence of critical bandwidth: notched-noise masking paradigm.
Seaton WH
J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 262463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of acoustic reflex on pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural patients.
Hammond JA; Pang-Ching GK
J Aud Res; 1979 Apr; 19(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 549912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the relationship of stapedial contraction to central masking.
Youngblood J; Martin FN
J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7349870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification].
Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central fatigue in a perstimulatory paradigm.
Grauer RA; Dunn BE
J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 7345064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal integration and presbycusis.
Wall LG; Stephenson M
J Aud Res; 1982 Jul; 22(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 7187671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High frequency Bekesy audiometry: II. Threshold test procedure, reliability and validity.
Gauz MT; Ahroon WA; Roberts SD
J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 7349867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Auditory adaptation and auditory fatigue].
Haider M; Koller M; Kundi M; Schwetz F; Welleschick B
HNO; 1987 Apr; 35(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 3583835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audiometry: masking.
Hamid MA; Brookler KH
Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Oct; 85(10):646-7. PubMed ID: 17124933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Backward and forward masking with reproducible noise bursts.
Waltzman SB; Levitt H
J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):251-64. PubMed ID: 756866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
Lundeen C
J Aud Res; 1987 Jan; 27(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 3448067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds.
Carmichael ME; Hall SE; Phillips DP
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):18-23. PubMed ID: 18761067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio.
Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of two procedural modifications of the frequency of false-alarm responses during pure-tone threshold determination.
Dancer JE; Conn M
J Aud Res; 1983 Jul; 23(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 6680723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suprathreshold Bekesy excursion widths in normal and sensorineural impaired listeners.
Domico WD
J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 3842136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
