119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6679600)
1. The least restrictive alternative: more about less.
Klein J
Psychiatr Q; 1983; 55(2-3):106-14. PubMed ID: 6679600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of law on deinstitutionalization.
Rachlin S
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1983 Mar; (17):41-54. PubMed ID: 6672605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The least restrictive alternative in the postinstitutional era.
Munetz MR; Geller JL
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Oct; 44(10):967-73. PubMed ID: 8225278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Mental Health Act 1983 for England and Wales: contemporary issues and proposals for reform ten years on.
Bluglass R
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():111-5. PubMed ID: 7799535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Perspectives on reform].
Ledesma E
Soins Psychiatr; 2012; (281):11. PubMed ID: 22896960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring restrictiveness of psychiatric care.
Ransohoff P; Zachary RA; Gaynor J; Hargreaves WA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 May; 33(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 7076156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Balancing care and control: guardianship, community treatment orders and patient safeguards.
Fennell P
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):205-35. PubMed ID: 1587655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary admission--a century of experience.
Schwartz L
J Clin Psychiatry; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7054153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Warrants of the Lieutenant Governor.
Turner RE
Can J Psychiatry; 1987 Jun; 32(5):337-42. PubMed ID: 3651975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems in implementing the 1991 Treatment of Mental Patients Law in Israel.
Mester R; Mendel A; Gonen N; Becker D; Adlesberg S
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):102-7; discussion 108. PubMed ID: 7558754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Still a long way to go.
Reagan EA
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1994 Sep; 32(9):10-1. PubMed ID: 7799259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental patient advocacy by a patient advocate.
Perlin ML
Psychiatr Q; 1982; 54(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 7182857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Legal and medical criteria with respect to deprival of freedom of movement in mental patients (author's transl)].
Hess M
Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1980 Aug; 42(8):520-2. PubMed ID: 6450368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. President's message: The most beneficial alternative: a counterpoint to the least restrictive alternative.
Perr IN
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(4):iv-vii. PubMed ID: 752375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advocacy and the mentally ill.
Willetts R
Soc Work; 1980 Sep; 25(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 10248421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The objectives of the reform of hospitalisation under restraint in psychiatry].
Ledesma E
Soins Psychiatr; 2012; (281):12-7. PubMed ID: 22896961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competency determinations.
Beck JC
Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Oct; 145(10):1325-6. PubMed ID: 3421374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why the gap? Practice and policy in civil commitment hearings.
Turkheimer E; Parry CD
Am Psychol; 1992 May; 47(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 1642374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
Treffert DA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patients' rights and patients' needs--are they compatible?
Pepper B; Ryglewicz H
Psychiatr Q; 1982; 54(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 7182858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
