These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Human life symposium: a synopsis and critique. Taub S Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 6920538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject. Himma KE J Med Ethics; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15634753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How technology is reframing the abortion debate. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient. Murray TH Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):329-43. PubMed ID: 3595055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a Copernican revolution in our thinking about life's beginning and life's end. Green RM Soundings; 1983; 66(2):152-73. PubMed ID: 10264110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fetus as person: Possible legal consequences of the Hogan-Helms Amendment. Pilpel HF Fam Plann Perspect; 1974; 6(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 4459148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion: is there a rational precept? Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Curran WJ Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The brain-life theory: towards a consistent biological definition of humanness. Goldenring JM J Med Ethics; 1985 Dec; 11(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 4078859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status. Gertler GB South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment. Westfall D Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn. King PA Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Theoretical medical considerations with reference to fetal and maternal rights in pregnancy termination]. Beller FK Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Nov; 87(10-11):833-6. PubMed ID: 8303923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person? Lenow JL Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]