124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6681326)
1. Turtle shells as an auditory receptor.
Lenhardt ML; Harkins SW
J Aud Res; 1983 Oct; 23(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 6681326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marine turtle reception of bone-conducted sound.
Lenhardt ML; Bellmund S; Byles RA; Harkins SW; Musick JA
J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 6679547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
Folsom RC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brainstem responses in the aged cat.
Harrison J; Buchwald J
Neurobiol Aging; 1982; 3(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 6298646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesion.
Noffsinger D; Martinez CD; Schaefer AB
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():81-93. PubMed ID: 6955930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
Dum N; von Wedel H
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of masking on the ipsi- and contralateral brainstem evoked potential.
Knothe J; Hofmann G
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1985; 242(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 4038155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
Owen GA; Burkard R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-latency auditory responses obtained by cross correlation.
Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1411-21. PubMed ID: 6512103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influence of the interaction of sound and vibration sensitivity on the masking effect].
Shapiro ML
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (3):13-4. PubMed ID: 7269035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of masking on the auditive potentials of the brainstem and on the action potential of the VIII nerve in man].
Prosser S; Arslan E; Sánchez Prieto C
An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1984; 11(5-6):445-57. PubMed ID: 6524648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-conducted auditory brainstem-evoked responses and skull vibratory velocity measurement in rats at frequencies of 0.5-30 kHz with a new giant magnetostrictive bone conduction transducer.
Sakai Y; Karino S; Kaga K
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):926-33. PubMed ID: 16864489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binaural interaction of bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses.
Setou M; Kurauchi T; Tsuzuku T; Kaga K
Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 121(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 11508509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio.
Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Auditory potentials of the brain stem masked by continuous wide-band noise].
Prosser S; Arslan E
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1983; 3(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 6675418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory brainstem responses: masking related changes in wave VI.
Reid A; Birchall JP; Moffat DA
Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6722368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
Wong WY; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of bone conduction stimulated ABR, MLR and otoacoustic emissions.
Collet L; Chanal JM; Hellal H; Gartner M; Morgon A
Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 2749175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
