These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6682399)
21. Guess who suffers when HEW folds a PSRO? Service R Med Econ; 1979 Jul; 56(15):144-7, 149, 153-4 passim. PubMed ID: 10273162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Perspectives. PROs set to go. Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Nov; 38(45):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10273596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. PROs explore changes in current review process. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Apr; 76(4):24-6, 29. PubMed ID: 10109750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Health Care Financing Administration--Professional Standards Review; redesignation of PSRO areas in California. Final regulation. Fed Regist; 1980 Jul; 45(141):48620-2. PubMed ID: 10273210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. HMO? PSRO? How do you know? Sansone JD Respir Care; 1975 Mar; 20(3):265-7. PubMed ID: 10314971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. PROs shift toward quality as HMO review nears. Cotton P Med World News; 1986 Dec; 27(24):46-8, 53-9. PubMed ID: 10279842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Indiana PSRO faces federal fund cutoff. Holcomb B Health Care Week; 1978 Nov; 2(19):1, 23. PubMed ID: 10324375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. PROs are determined to do more than HCFA requires. Hosp Peer Rev; 1983 Sep; 8(9):109-12. PubMed ID: 10273391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Study prompts debate over PROs' focus. Tokarski C Mod Healthc; 1990 Mar; 20(12):43. PubMed ID: 10104040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. PROs in transition. Bomberger I Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10278605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. HSA/PSRO relationships. Rothenberg E; Schimel D Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1977 Nov; 5(11):24-6. PubMed ID: 569232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. PROs likely to emerge as the watchdog of new payment system. Aronson P; Hellow J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10273351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. PSRO: the federal perspective. Munier WB Hosp Formul; 1975 Jun; 10(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 10273080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. HCFA is not imposing quotas on PROs, administrator says. Davis CK Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(6):50-1. PubMed ID: 10273635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. PROs gear up for their changing health care roles. Interview by Jeffrey Finn. Webber A Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(11):82-3. PubMed ID: 3699767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Legislative currents: three recent federal documents indicate the PSRO program's priorities. Cofer J J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 May; 55(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 10310604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of PROs on hospitals and pharmacy practice. Black BL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3548342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assumption of review responsibility by conditional PSROs; conclusive effect of PSRO determinations on claims payment; correlation of Title XI functions with functions required under Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Act. Fed Regist; 1978 Feb; 43(36):7399-412. PubMed ID: 10306560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]