These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6682499)

  • 21. [Value of multimodal evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Reisecker F; Hubatschek W; Steinhäusl H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jun; 98(12):379-85. PubMed ID: 3739354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: basal and follow-up data.
    Gambi D; Rossini PM; Marchionno L; Iarlori T; Finarelli A; Pirchio M
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():551-7. PubMed ID: 7054984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Delayed evoked potentials in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Pillay N; Hunter T
    J Rheumatol; 1986 Feb; 13(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 3701727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The combined use of instrumental and laboratory examinations in multiple sclerosis: is the diagnostic facilitation real?].
    Paolino E; Granieri E; Tola MR; Govoni V; Casetta I; Monetti VC; Carreras M
    Riv Neurol; 1990; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 2247751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The value of a multimodal evoked potential approach in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Kjaer M
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():507-12. PubMed ID: 7054978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.
    Purves SJ; Low MD; Galloway J; Reeves B
    Can J Neurol Sci; 1981 Feb; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7225952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Visual and acoustic evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis].
    Kofler B
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 135(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 3976237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Serial evoked potential studies in patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Clinical relevance.
    Aminoff MJ; Davis SL; Panitch HS
    Arch Neurol; 1984 Nov; 41(11):1197-202. PubMed ID: 6487104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Electrophysiological diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].
    Inamizu S; Tobimatsu S
    Nihon Rinsho; 2014 Nov; 72(11):1983-8. PubMed ID: 25518381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Gebarski SS; Gabrielsen TO; Gilman S; Knake JE; Latack JT; Aisen AM
    Ann Neurol; 1985 May; 17(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 4004170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Contribution of non-clinical tests.
    Sanders EA; Reulen JP; Van der Velde EA; Hogenhuis LA
    J Neurol Sci; 1986 Feb; 72(2-3):273-85. PubMed ID: 3711936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis: a two year follow up study.
    Walsh JC; Garrick R; Cameron J; McLeod JG
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 45(6):494-500. PubMed ID: 7119812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conversion to multiple sclerosis after a clinically isolated syndrome of the brainstem: cranial magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and neurophysiological findings.
    Sastre-Garriga J; Tintoré M; Rovira A; Grivé E; Pericot I; Comabella M; Thompson AJ; Montalban X
    Mult Scler; 2003 Feb; 9(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 12617267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brain stem auditory and visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.
    Kjaer M
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1980 Jul; 62(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 7211155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.
    Chiappa KH
    Neurology; 1980 Jul; 30(7 Pt 2):110-23. PubMed ID: 6993991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Success and failure of evoked potentials in detecting clinical and subclinical lesions in multiple sclerosis patients.
    van Buggenhout E; Ketelaer P; Carton H
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1982; 84(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 6282514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison between auditory and visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.
    Djupesland G; Tvete O; Stein R; Bachen NI
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():135-7. PubMed ID: 6944770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multimodal evoked potentials and CSF findings in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Morocutti C; Pozzessere G; Valle E; Mollica MA; Quadrini R; Sanarelli L; Rizzo PA; Amabile G
    Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 3672010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple sclerosis: incorporation of results of laboratory techniques in the diagnosis.
    Polman CH; Koetsier JC; Wolters EC
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1985; 87(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 4053472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
    Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
    Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.