These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 668333)
1. Concentrations of patch test allergens: are we comparing the same things? Benezra C; Andanson J; Chabeau C; Ducombs G; Foussereau J; Lachapelle JM; Lacroix M; Martin P Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Apr; 4(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 668333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ring-shaped positive allergic patch test reactions to allergens in liquid vehicles. Lachapelle JM; Tennstedt D; Fyad A; Masmoudi ML; Nouaigui H Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Apr; 18(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 3378431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination. McLelland J; Shuster S Br J Dermatol; 1990 May; 122(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 2354115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plastibase: a new base for patch testing of metal antigens. Bajaj AK; Gupta SC; Chatterjee AK Int J Dermatol; 1990; 29(1):73. PubMed ID: 2329029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test. Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch test reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis. Uehara M; Ofuji S Arch Dermatol; 1976 Jul; 112(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 938073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proallergens of formaldehyde applied in patch testing of formaldehyde contact allergy. Hansen J; Albrechtsen S; HedegÄrd K J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):838-40. PubMed ID: 2600209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing. Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data. Atkinson JC; Rodi SB Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Brockow K; Romano A; Blanca M; Ring J; Pichler W; Demoly P Allergy; 2002 Jan; 57(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 11991289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Allergic contact dermatitis from heparin-containing gel: use of scratch patch test for diagnosis. Nino M; Patruno C; Zagaria O; Balato N Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 19470303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. European multicenter study of TRUE Test, Panel 2. Wilkinson JD; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Frosch PJ; Gunnarsson Y; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM; Ring J; Shaw S; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 2189668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2. Notes from the lost and found department. Rietschel RL; Adams RM; Maibach HI; Storrs FJ; Rosenthal LE J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):42-5. PubMed ID: 3346408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing for adverse drug reactions. Sekhon S; Nedorost ST Cutis; 2017 Jan; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28207004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test. Peltonen L Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch test results with standard allergens over a decade. Young E; Houwing RH Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 3652697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]