132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 668344)
1. Day 7 (D7) patch test reading - valuable or not?
Mitchell JC
Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Jun; 4(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 668344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
Mitchell JC
Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2. Notes from the lost and found department.
Rietschel RL; Adams RM; Maibach HI; Storrs FJ; Rosenthal LE
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):42-5. PubMed ID: 3346408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Accuracy of patch tests with potassium dichromate].
Rudzki E; Kozłowska A
Przegl Dermatol; 1980; 67(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 7455150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch test responses evaluated by cutaneous blood flow measurements.
Staberg B; Klemp P; Serup J
Arch Dermatol; 1984 Jun; 120(6):741-3. PubMed ID: 6232901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 4-day patch test reactions to neomycin and formaldehyde.
Massone L; Anonìde A; Borghi S; Isola V
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Nov; 21(5):344-5. PubMed ID: 2620516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Positive reactions to patch test with cosmetics].
Hayakawa R; Kobayashi M; Kawase A; Hojo T; Adachi A
Nihon Rinsho; 1977 Aug; 35(8):2675-8. PubMed ID: 926362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7.
Jonker MJ; Bruynzeel DP
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):330-5. PubMed ID: 10871096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative frequency of immediate and delayed patch test reactions.
Dikeakou T; Katsarou-Katsari A; Hatziolou E; Katsambas A
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 3180785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The patch test.
Guin JD
J Ark Med Soc; 1984 Mar; 80(10):444-6. PubMed ID: 6232255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of Al-test patch test.
Hayakawa R; Kobayashi M; Ueda H; Morikawa F
J Dermatol; 1975 Sep; 2(3):111-4. PubMed ID: 1107385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of patch test reactions by transcutaneous PO2 measurement.
Prens EP; van Joost T; Steketee J
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Mar; 16(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 3581821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Patch tests: interpretation of results (author's transl)].
Sertoli A; Fabbri P; Spallanzani P
Med Lav; 1980; 71(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 6450316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 24-, 48-, and 48/48-hour patch tests.
Jordan WP
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 7398277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic patch test concentration for Kathon CG.
Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 4085223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents.
Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Mar; 20(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 2721192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Primin standard patch testing: 5 years experience.
Ingber A; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2401139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
Lachapelle JM
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
