These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6683892)

  • 1. A beam corrected estimation of the frequency dependent attenuation of biological tissues from backscattered ultrasound.
    Cloostermans MJ; Thijssen JM
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 6683892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral characterization and attenuation measurements in ultrasound.
    Flax SW; Pelc NJ; Glover GH; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):95-116. PubMed ID: 6683894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffraction and dispersion effects on the estimation of ultrasound attenuation and velocity in biological tissues.
    Verhoef WA; Cloostermans MJ; Thijssen JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1985 Jul; 32(7):521-9. PubMed ID: 4018833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A single transducer transaxial compression technique for the estimation of sound speed in biological tissues.
    Ophir J; Moriya T; Yazdi Y
    Ultrason Imaging; 1991 Jul; 13(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 1957424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency dependence of acoustic parameters of freshly excised tissues of Sprague Dawley rats.
    Bhagat P; Kadaba M; Ware R; Cockerill W
    Ultrasonics; 1977 Jul; 15(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 878064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noninvasive bladder volume measurements based on nonlinear wave distortion.
    Bouakaz A; Merks E; Lancée C; Bom N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 15121249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On estimating the number density of random scatterers from backscattered acoustic signals.
    Sleefe GE; Lele PP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):709-27. PubMed ID: 3062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.
    Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):533-43. PubMed ID: 22779499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instrument for microscopical observation of the biophysical effects of ultrasound.
    Miller DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Nov; 60(5):1203-12. PubMed ID: 977847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter.
    Jang HS; Lee MH; Park SB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring imaging of lesions induced by high intensity focused ultrasound based on differential ultrasonic attenuation and integrated backscatter estimation.
    Zhong H; Wan MX; Jiang YF; Wang SP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17189050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms.
    Bigelow TA; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1431-9. PubMed ID: 15807030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral variations in tissues and phantoms.
    Flax SW; Glover GH; Pelc NJ; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():127-31. PubMed ID: 6400227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study of ultrasound attenuation during HIFU propagation in ox liver].
    Li F; Bai J; Wang Z; Ma P; Du Y; Wu F; Feng R
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 20(4):675-8. PubMed ID: 14716875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3-D real-time motion correction in high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy.
    Pernot M; Tanter M; Fink M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1239-49. PubMed ID: 15550328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A unified approach to modeling the backscattered Doppler ultrasound from blood.
    Mo LY; Cobbold RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 May; 39(5):450-61. PubMed ID: 1526636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intercostal high intensity focused ultrasound for liver ablation: The influence of beam shaping on sonication efficacy and near-field risks.
    de Greef M; Schubert G; Wijlemans JW; Koskela J; Bartels LW; Moonen CT; Ries M
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4685-97. PubMed ID: 26233196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation of ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers using a frequency domain model.
    Rao M; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3162-9. PubMed ID: 18697541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic attenuation estimation in-vivo using the difference ratio correction method.
    Zhou K; Zhang D; Lin C; Zhu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2532-8. PubMed ID: 1479118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.