These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6683894)

  • 1. Spectral characterization and attenuation measurements in ultrasound.
    Flax SW; Pelc NJ; Glover GH; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):95-116. PubMed ID: 6683894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral variations in tissues and phantoms.
    Flax SW; Glover GH; Pelc NJ; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():127-31. PubMed ID: 6400227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic attenuation in soft tissues: measurements in vitro.
    Mottley JG; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1203-10. PubMed ID: 2229659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A beam corrected estimation of the frequency dependent attenuation of biological tissues from backscattered ultrasound.
    Cloostermans MJ; Thijssen JM
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 6683892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of anisotropy in the ultrasonic attenuation of tissue on computed tomography.
    Brandenburger GH; Klepper JR; Miller JB; Synder DL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1981 Apr; 3(2):113-43. PubMed ID: 7196105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound attenuation measurements of the liver in vivo using a commercial sector scanner.
    Garra BS; Shawker TH; Nassi M; Russell MA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Oct; 6(4):396-407. PubMed ID: 6399170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors.
    Yao LX; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jan; 12(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 2184569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scatter and attenuation correction for 111In based on energy spectrum fitting.
    Kaplan MS; Miyaoka RS; Kohlmyer SK; Haynor DR; Harrison RL; Lewellen TK
    Med Phys; 1996 Jul; 23(7):1277-85. PubMed ID: 8839424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral shifts of ultrasonic propagation: a study of theoretical and experimental models.
    Narayana PA; Ophir J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Jan; 5(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 6683016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency dependence of acoustic parameters of freshly excised tissues of Sprague Dawley rats.
    Bhagat P; Kadaba M; Ware R; Cockerill W
    Ultrasonics; 1977 Jul; 15(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 878064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A spectral approach to ultrasonic scattering from human tissue: methods, objectives and backscattering measurements.
    Chivers RC; Hill CR
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):799-815. PubMed ID: 1187780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimate of attenuation coefficient for ultrasonic tissue characterization using time-varying state-space model.
    Shih LY; Barnes CW; Ferrari LA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 3057715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic attenuation estimation in-vivo using the difference ratio correction method.
    Zhou K; Zhang D; Lin C; Zhu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2532-8. PubMed ID: 1479118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microprocessor-base system for ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Bhagat PK; Kadaba MP; Gupta VN; Wu V
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 7412654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo attenuation estimation in reflection mode.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Berger G; Perrin J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():117-22. PubMed ID: 6400225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal precision in ultrasound attenuation estimation and application to the detection of Duchenne muscular dystrophy carriers.
    Berger G; Laugier P; Fink M; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1987 Jan; 9(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3299966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
    Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attenuation of ultrasound: magnitude and frequency dependence for tissue characterization.
    Parker KJ; Lerner RM; Waag RC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 6387795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.