These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6684037)

  • 1. Electrophysiological responses in guinea pig cochlea to low frequency sound stimuli: distortion of cochlear microphonic (CM) wave form.
    Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1983; 51(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6684037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects on cochlear microphonics in guinea pigs induced by prolonged exposure to low-frequency sound.
    Maehara N; Sadamoto T; Yamamura K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1984; 52(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 6539683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spectral content of the cochlear microphonic measured in scala media of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Hubbard AE; Mountain DC; Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):415-30. PubMed ID: 512203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of low-frequency ultrasound on the inner ear: an electrophysiological study using the guinea pig cochlea.
    Ishida A; Matsui T; Yamamura K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 250(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8466746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effects of acoustic overstimulation of 2F1-F2 distortion product in cochlear microphonics].
    Yoshida M; Aoyagi M; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Apr; 97(4):680-3. PubMed ID: 8189316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fine structure of the intracochlear potential field. II. Tone-evoked waveforms and cochlear microphonics.
    Zidanic M; Brownell WE
    J Neurophysiol; 1992 Jan; 67(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 1552313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of high-frequency sound on the guinea pig cochlea. Electrophysiological study using cochlear microphonics, action and endocochlear potential.
    Ishida A; Sugisawa T; Yamamura K
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 8265117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The phase and magnitude of hair cell receptor potentials and frequency tuning in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Kössl M; Russell IJ
    J Neurosci; 1992 May; 12(5):1575-86. PubMed ID: 1578256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sound pressure isopotential levels for the microphonic potential of the internal ear].
    Tokarev OP; Kruglov AV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1984 Mar; 70(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 6724039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Recio-Spinoso A; Oghalai JS
    J Physiol; 2017 Jul; 595(13):4549-4561. PubMed ID: 28382742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.
    Brown DJ; Hartsock JJ; Gill RM; Fitzgerald HE; Salt AN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2129-45. PubMed ID: 19354389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of 250 and 500 Hz tone exposure on the inner ear of guinea pigs as determined by electrophysiological techniques.
    Fujita T; Sugisawa T; Matsui T; Takahashi M; Inada N; Ishida A; Yamamura K
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1991; 53(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 1852412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voltage-dependent elements are involved in the generation of the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Hubbard AE; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 7440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the effect of 350-Hz tone exposure on electrophysiological function of the inner ear of guinea pigs.
    Yamamura K; Sugisawa T; Inada N; Matsui T; Ishida A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1584586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The responses of inner hair cells to basilar membrane velocity during low frequency auditory stimulation in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Sellick PM; Russell IJ
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):439-45. PubMed ID: 7410248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some experimental observations of responses evoked from the cochlea during two-tone stimulation.
    Brown AM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1986; 48(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 3703531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the spectra of the cochlear microphonic and of the sound-elicited electrical impedance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Hubbard AE; Geisler CD; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):431-45. PubMed ID: 512204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the middle ear reflex on sound transmission to the inner ear of rat.
    Pilz PK; Ostwald J; Kreiter A; Schnitzler HU
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):171-82. PubMed ID: 9083814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.