These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6684668)

  • 1. Legal issues raised by private review activities of medical peer-review organizations.
    Hastings DA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 6684668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal issues in peer review for self-insured employers.
    Ragsdale JC
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 4073393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
    Mills DH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rhode Island Supreme Court affirms limited nature of peer-review privilege.
    Kraus LM; Vernaglia LW
    Med Health R I; 2007 Jun; 90(6):187-8. PubMed ID: 17633592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From PSROs to PROs: regs are the next major step for the new peer review law.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):10-32. PubMed ID: 10273309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy.
    Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Professional Standards Review Organizations and confidentiality: the question of public access to medical peer review data through the Freedom of Information Act.
    Hastings DA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1981; 6(1):136-58. PubMed ID: 7196423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians.
    Nijm LM
    J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: a secret affair?
    Dunn LJ
    Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal issues concerning peer review documents.
    Dunn LJ; Holbrook RF
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10252576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Professional review and regulations.
    George JE; Quattrone MS; Phillips J
    N J Med; 1990 Dec; 87(12):983-6. PubMed ID: 2270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity.
    Beatty Y
    Tenn Med; 2010 Sep; 103(8):17. PubMed ID: 20961014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opening the door on Medicare peer review.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2002 Mar; 79(5):110-2, 116, 118. PubMed ID: 11913165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. New benefits and burdens for physicians.
    Mickelsen RA
    Minn Med; 1987 Dec; 70(12):691-3. PubMed ID: 3696122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
    Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD
    Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Medicolegal issues arising in the emerging mandated health data disclosure era.
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Aug; 3(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 2980939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review records--should they be discoverable and admissible in judicial proceedings?
    Doudera AE
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(3):10-1, 13, 20. PubMed ID: 10238872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.