These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6684668)

  • 21. Disclosure of confidential information to and by professional review organizations.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 10274706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discoverability of peer review committee records: an update.
    Roach WH; Chernoff SN
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 10265592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disclosure of information to and by peer review organizations.
    Hawthorne KJ
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10302725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Legally permissible uses of mandated health data disclosure.
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Nov; 3(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 2980945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can peer review go public and survive?
    Peck RL
    Med Econ; 1979 Dec; 56(26):187-9. PubMed ID: 10273189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HCFA requires hospitals to furnish PSROs with copies of patient records; AHA demands withdrawal of provision.
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Mar; 3(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 10273195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review confidentiality survives legal challenge.
    Murphy JF
    Ir Med J; 2008 May; 101(5):132. PubMed ID: 18624255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicare program; utilization and quality control Peer Review Organization (PRO) area designations and definitions of eligible organizations--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Feb; 49(39):7202-8. PubMed ID: 10273453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thumbing through medical records: confidentiality vs. the need to know.
    Jackson CB
    Internist; 1980 Apr; 21(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 10273188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. State access to peer review records: a clash of public policy.
    Singer AR; Willett DE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 10294742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medicare programs; utilization and quality control peer reviews organization (PRO) area designations and definitions of eligible organizations--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1983 Aug; 48(158):36970-5. PubMed ID: 10273375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities.
    Feehan KP
    Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Confidentiality and disclosure of Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) information: proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Jan; 44(10):3058-66. PubMed ID: 10273117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statement of the American Medical Record Association on PSRO disclosure policy.
    Ashmore N
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1981 Apr; 52(2):28, 95-6. PubMed ID: 10273256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers.
    Brown LC
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medicare program; acquisition, protection and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(74):14977-86. PubMed ID: 10273479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.