These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 668677)

  • 1. The relation between field dependency, visual search and structure of displays.
    Bone K
    Ergonomics; 1978 May; 21(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 668677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task.
    Schori TR
    Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ocular measures of redundancy gain during visual search of colour symbolic displays.
    Backs RW; Walrath LC
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 7671860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
    Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays.
    Tory M; Kirkpatrick AE; Atkins MS; Möller T
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 16382603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in feature search as a function of exposure duration.
    Harpur LL; Scialfa CT; Thomas DM
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 7744167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age and the ability to inhibit distractor information in visual selective attention.
    Kotary L; Hoyer WJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 7628509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing the visibility of displays for older observers.
    Kline DW
    Exp Aging Res; 1994; 20(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 8194572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual displays.
    Tlauka M; Stanton D; McKenna FP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):764-70. PubMed ID: 10902886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial resolution of visual feedback affects variability and structure of isometric force.
    Kuznetsov NA; Riley MA
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Feb; 470(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 20045718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guided visual search in individuals with mental retardation.
    Carlin MT; Soraci SA; Dennis NA; Strawbridge C; Chechile NA
    Am J Ment Retard; 2002 Jul; 107(4):237-51. PubMed ID: 12069643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model.
    Meyer J
    Ergonomics; 2000 Nov; 43(11):1840-65. PubMed ID: 11105976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking performance with visual, auditory, or electrocutaneous displays.
    Hofmann MA; Heimstra NW
    Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 5022472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal variation in the luminance level of stimuli displayed on a cathode-ray tube monitor: effects on performance on a visual vigilance task.
    Blanco MJ; Leirós LI
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 10675061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty.
    Chan AH; Tang NY
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 17419160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults.
    Merrill EC; Lookadoo R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Sep; 89(1):72-90. PubMed ID: 15336919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.