These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6687042)

  • 1. A new acoustic method for the discrimination of monozygotic and dizygotic twins.
    Forrai G; Gordos G
    Acta Paediatr Hung; 1983; 24(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 6687042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice similarity in identical twins.
    Van Gysel WD; Vercammen J; Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2001; 55(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11256192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voice onset time production in older and younger female monozygotic twins.
    Ryalls J; Shaw H; Simon M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15087572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Similarity of monozygotic twins regarding vocal performance and acoustic markers and possible clinical significance].
    Fuchs M; Oeken J; Hotopp T; Täschner R; Hentschel B; Behrendt W
    HNO; 2000 Jun; 48(6):462-9. PubMed ID: 10929228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech tempo and fundamental frequency patterns: a case study of male monozygotic twins and an age- and sex-matched sibling.
    Whiteside SP; Rixon E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Dec; 38(4):173-81. PubMed ID: 23194081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech technology and cinema: can they learn from each other?
    Pauletto S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 23870066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Multiparametric description of voice quality for normal male and female voices based on acoustic analyses].
    Pützer M; Wokurek W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Feb; 85(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 16498539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice field measurements--a new method of examination: the influence of hearing on the human voice.
    Lejska M
    J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 15193654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speaking fundamental frequency in monozygotic and dizygotic twins.
    Debruyne F; Decoster W; Van Gijsel A; Vercammen J
    J Voice; 2002 Dec; 16(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 12512633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.
    Xue SA; Lower A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20815471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causes of delivery and outcomes of very preterm twins stratified to zygosity.
    Spiegler J; Härtel C; Schulz L; von Wurmb-Schwark N; Hoehn T; Kribs A; Küster H; Siegel J; Wieg C; Weichert J; Herting E; Göpel W;
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 15(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 22853920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of recordings of sentences and spontaneous speech: perceptual and acoustic measures in preschool children's voices.
    McAllister A; Brandt SK
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):673.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22717494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement and prediction of voice support and room gain in school classrooms.
    Pelegrín-García D; Brunskog J; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Löfqvist A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):194-204. PubMed ID: 22280584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidirectional regression (MDR)-based features for automatic voice disorder detection.
    Muhammad G; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Mahmood A; Alsulaiman M
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e19-27. PubMed ID: 23177748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zygosity and intrauterine growth of twins.
    Grennert L; Persson PH; Gennser G; Gullberg B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jun; 55(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 7383453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.