BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6687933)

  • 1. Cochlear implant patient performance on the MAC battery.
    Edgerton BJ; Prietto A; Danhauer JL
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1983 Feb; 16(1):267-80. PubMed ID: 6687933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary assessment of the Los Angeles, Vienna and Melbourne cochlear implants.
    McCabe BF; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ; Lowder MW; Otto SR; Preece JP
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():247-53. PubMed ID: 6596849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rehabilitation and results with the single electrode cochlear implant.
    Maddox HE; Porter TH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1983 Feb; 16(1):257-65. PubMed ID: 6687932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech tracking in the evaluation of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis.
    Jenkins H; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Mar; 99(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 2918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory capabilities of patients implanted with the House single-channel cochlear implant.
    Brimacombe JA; Edgerton BJ; Doyle KJ; Erratt JD; Danhauer JL
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():204-16. PubMed ID: 6596844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Speech discrimination with bilateral cochlear implants in noisy conditions].
    Au KK; Jin H; Hui Y; Wei L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 12761958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Hearing and speech discrimination scores of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD; Egelierler B; Adunka O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):492-7. PubMed ID: 10890127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Taking advantage of residual hearing by a hearing aid or a cochlear implant: a comparative study using the MAC (Minimal Auditory Capabilities) battery of tests].
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Ther Umsch; 1987 Feb; 44(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 3576499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.