These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Collection and evaluation of audiograms using computers]. Grabner H; Lejhanec J; Neumann H; Schwetz F Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1972; 6():197-202. PubMed ID: 4536524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A program for audiometric control: linking the PC Werth 'Kamplex BA12' computer audiometer to an IBM AT/XT/PC or compatible microcomputer using innovative software SMART programs. Grogan JB J Soc Occup Med; 1987; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 3573738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Jerlvall L; Dryselius H; Arlinger S Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 6689085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The audioanalysator. A bridge between audiometry and psychoacoustics]. Schlitt H; Wullstein HL; Wullstein SR Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 May; 64(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 4021674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [From the expert office: pseudo-"air-bone-gap" in sensorineural hearing loss]. Brusis T Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Jan; 89(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 20058216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A computer-based test system for implementing pure-tone audiometry, acoustic immittance and tympanic membrane displacement measurements. Marchbanks RJ; Martin AM Br J Audiol; 1985 Feb; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 3839147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized audiometry--a facility to prevent hearing damages caused by noise. Ivarsson A; Toremalm NG; Bennrup S Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 449():175-81. PubMed ID: 3059750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computerized automatic audiometer. Sakabe N; Miyashita Y; Itami E Med Inform (Lond); 1981; 6(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 7341889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A micro-computer based trainer for pure-tone audiometry. Gatehouse S Br J Audiol; 1986 May; 20(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 3755070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between coupler gain and insertion gain of hearing aids as used in partially hearing units in five schools in Belfast. Harris WE; Adams DA Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 2790312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microcomputer-controlled psychoacoustics in clinical audiology. Lutman ME J Med Eng Technol; 1983; 7(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 6688096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The present position of the computer in audiometry (author's transl)]. Fritze W Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Jun; 59(6):356-68. PubMed ID: 7005573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise. Arlinger SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Humes LE J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid. de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Storage of audiometric data - online - with a small computer. Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD; Becker D Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1980; 226(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 7458753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A software tool for pure-tone audiometry: Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. German version]. Rahne T; Buthut F; Plößl S; Plontke SK HNO; 2015 Dec; 63(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 26607155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]