These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6688744)

  • 21. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Lister FL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developmental changes in high-frequency sensitivity.
    Trehub SE; Schneider BA; Morrongiello BA; Thorpe LA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(5):241-9. PubMed ID: 2803110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Analysis of psychoacoustic characteristics and audiology tests of tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss].
    Chen Q; Zheng Y; Qiu Z; Luo H
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):449-51. PubMed ID: 22870717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model.
    Holube I; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1703-16. PubMed ID: 8817896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [An automated tracking audiometer].
    Bouchet P; Pernier J; Gerin P; Morgon A; Ubersfeld A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1983 May; 21(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 6876912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Prida TL; Stiles D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11218102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology.
    Zwicker E; Schorn K
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):120-40. PubMed ID: 646730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Suitability of the middle acoustic evoked potential P35 for frequency-specific measurements].
    Brusis T; Bockisch A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Dec; 64(12):631-7. PubMed ID: 4087995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Auditive training in sensorineural hearing loss].
    Knaster J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1988; 39(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 3273243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Altered attentional filters in subjects with graded levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bester CW; Robertson D; Taljaard D; Hammond G
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():80-87. PubMed ID: 28610719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency selectivity in normal-hearing listeners using a sweep, frequency-modulated masker: a preliminary report.
    McDonald JM
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 6618042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Further interpretation of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) test.
    Olsen CC; Berry GA
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 531475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The automatic tone decay test as part of dynamic measurement of threshold.
    Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1980; 226(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 7458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Komputerwa analiza, identyfikacja i graficzna prezentacja badań ABR--system audiometrii klinicznej. [Computer analysis, identification and graphic representation of ABR research--clinical audiometric system].
    Fraczkowski K; Kokot K; Zapałowicz R
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1992; 46(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 1437174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An automated microcomputer based electric response audiometry system for machine scoring of auditory evoked potentials.
    Mason SM; Adams W
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1984 Aug; 5(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 6488728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear microphonic audiometry: a new hearing test for objective diagnosis of deafness.
    Poch-Broto J; Carricondo F; Bhathal B; Iglesias MC; López-Moya J; Rodríguez F; Sanjuán J; Gil-Loyzaga P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 129(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 18777216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modification and application of the computerized automatic audiometer.
    Sakabe N; Hirai Y; Itami E
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 756071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.