These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A dilemma. Do data processing realities meet buyer expectations? Erickson E Comput Healthc; 1985 Apr; 6(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 10278306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer model used to evaluate foundation had flawed assumptions. Carland JF Mod Healthc; 1985 Jun; 15(12):177-8. PubMed ID: 10278324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Choosing the right hardware. Chin TL Health Data Manag; 1999 Feb; 7(2):122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 10346127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Department systems: review both the system and the vendor to avoid costly mistakes. Stewart J Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10278372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Open vs. proprietary operating systems. Finding the right fit. Hubley M; Marietti C; Hess D Healthc Inform; 1997 May; 14(5):75-6, 78, 80-5. PubMed ID: 10167131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Time-on-task, technology and mathematics achievement. Louw J; Muller J; Tredoux C Eval Program Plann; 2008 Feb; 31(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18086498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. RIS (radiology information systems) selection criteria: Part 2. Boehme J; Choplin R Adm Radiol; 1990 Oct; 9(10):69-71. PubMed ID: 10107647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance program: a method to improve software management. Srinivasan CA; Dascher PE Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Jun; 35(6):24-6, 30-2. PubMed ID: 10251787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Without shame. Grossman RP J Learn Disabil; 1983 Mar; 16(3):178-9. PubMed ID: 6688087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]