111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6689259)
1. Cochlear prostheses: stimulation-induced damage.
Miller JM; Duckert LG; Malone MA; Pfingst BE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(6 Pt 1):599-609. PubMed ID: 6689259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea.
Maslan MJ; Miller JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Apr; 96(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 3108823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphological changes following cochlear implantation in the animal model.
Duckert LG; Miller JM
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():28-37. PubMed ID: 6441444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphological changes in the normal and neomycin-perfused guinea pig cochlea following chronic prosthetic implantation.
Duckert LG
Laryngoscope; 1983 Jul; 93(7):841-55. PubMed ID: 6688110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of electrically induced damage after cochlear implantation.
Duckert LG; Miller JM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(2 Pt 1):185-9. PubMed ID: 3754411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute morphological changes in guinea pig cochlea following electrical stimulation. A preliminary scanning electron microscope study.
Duckert LG; Miller JM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1982; 91(1 Pt 1):33-40. PubMed ID: 6896126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Middle-latency responses. II. Variation among stimulation sites.
Burton MJ; Miller JM; Kileny PR
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Apr; 115(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 2923689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiology of the electrically and mechanically damaged cochlea.
Hu K; Schwarz DW
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Aug; 18(5):199-204. PubMed ID: 2769831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear pathology. Hazards of long-term implants.
Sutton D
Arch Otolaryngol; 1984 Mar; 110(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 6367727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans.
van den Honert C; Stypulkowski PH
Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 3754550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear pathology with chronically implanted scala tympani electrodes.
Leake-Jones PA; Rebscher SJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():203-23. PubMed ID: 6575646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Black RC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relations between cochlear histopathology and hearing loss in experimental cochlear implantation.
O'Leary SJ; Monksfield P; Kel G; Connolly T; Souter MA; Chang A; Marovic P; O'Leary JS; Richardson R; Eastwood H
Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():27-35. PubMed ID: 23396095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Estimation of surviving auditory nerve by electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (FABR)--comparison between extra-cochlear stimulation and intra-cochlear stimulation].
Hatsushika S; Funasaka S
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Jul; 92(7):1005-11. PubMed ID: 2809867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
