These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6689326)
1. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. Shannon RV Hear Res; 1983 Oct; 12(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 6689326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels. Bierer JA; Nye AD Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users. Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants. Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation. Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. Shannon RV; Otto SR Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. Kwon BJ; van den Honert C J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. PubMed ID: 16708955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. McKay CM J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2209-24. PubMed ID: 22423717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe. Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve]. Naumann HH; Zwicker E; Scherer H; Seifert J; Leysieffer H; Zollner M Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation]. Müller J; Schön F Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Demorest ME; Fourakis MS J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3766-82. PubMed ID: 9193063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A functioning multichannel auditory nerve stimulator. A preliminary report on two human volunteers. Simmons FB; Mathews RG; Walker MG; White RL Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):170-5. PubMed ID: 442996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation. McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():230-3. PubMed ID: 7668649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]