These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6690124)
1. Long-term retrospective control procedures for monitoring analytical performance of laboratory instruments. Gozzo ML; Barbaresi G; Giocoli G; Zappacosta B; Zuppi C Clin Chem; 1984 Jan; 30(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 6690124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical bias in a quality control scheme. Allen JR; Earp R; Farrell EC; Grümer HD Clin Chem; 1969 Nov; 15(11):1039-44. PubMed ID: 5357060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control using the daily mean. Dixon K; Northam BE Clin Chim Acta; 1970 Nov; 30(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 5478335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality control in the clinical biology laboratory]. Mascart P Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1971; 29(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 5579077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of routine precision measurement in laboratory quality control. Van Peenen HJ; Townsend JF; Gammel G; Lindberg DA Tech Bull Regist Med Technol; 1968 Apr; 38(4):81-2. PubMed ID: 5653442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality control in the automated clinical chemistry laboratory]. Büttner H Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem; 1969 Jan; 7(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 5356224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory evaluation of the Du Pont "Dimension Clinical Chemistry System". Knight D; Singer R; White JM; Fraser CG Clin Chem; 1988 Sep; 34(9):1899-903. PubMed ID: 3416443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?]. Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Olympus AU 400 clinical chemistry analyzer. Bilić A; Alpeza I; Rukavina AS Clin Lab; 2000; 46(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10745974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician office analyzers. Do they satisfy medically useful criteria for analytical performance of laboratory tests? Nanji AA; Poon R; Hinberg I Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Jul; 112(7):757-9. PubMed ID: 3382331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method-comparison studies. Westgard JO; Hunt MR Clin Chem; 1973 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4683366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Beckman Synchron CX4 clinical chemistry analyzer in a hospital laboratory. Ambus T; Korogyi N; DeCampos F; Groom B; Innanen VT J Clin Lab Anal; 1990; 4(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 2313469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation. Aronsson T; Groth T Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():51-64. PubMed ID: 6599530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liquid and lyophilized quality-control materials compared for use in continuous-flow analysis. Elin RJ; Gray BA Clin Chem; 1984 Jan; 30(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 6690119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Desirable routine analytical goals for quantities assayed in serum. Discussion paper from the members of the external quality assessment (EQA) Working Group A on analytical goals in laboratory medicine. Stöckl D; Baadenhuijsen H; Fraser CG; Libeer JC; Petersen PH; Ricós C Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Mar; 33(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 7605829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]