These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6690385)

  • 1. Supreme Court rules on hospital issues--occasionally.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1984 Jan; 58(1):93. PubMed ID: 6690385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vitek v. Jones: transfer of prisoners to mental institutions.
    Gottlieb NR
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):175-207. PubMed ID: 7148833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court rules mentally ill prison inmates may be involuntarily medicated.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 May; 41(5):572. PubMed ID: 11642773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court rules on commitment.
    Herrington BS
    Psychiatr News; 1979 May; 14(10):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 10241478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court orders hearings in hospital transfers.
    McDonald MC
    Psychiatr News; 1980 Jun; 15(12):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10247416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supreme Court holds that children are not constitutionally entitled to pre-admission hearings prior to placement in psychiatric hospitals.
    Walker RL
    Clgh Rev; 1979 Nov; 13(6):513-5. PubMed ID: 11665119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-authorised deprivation of liberty.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jan; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25559028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term.
    Wing KR; Carman R
    Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights?
    Brooks W
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
    Meisel A
    Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
    Roberts TD
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
    Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of Addington v. Texas on involuntary civil commitment.
    Hays JR
    Psychol Rep; 1981 Dec; 65(3 pt. 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 11659310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.