These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6690537)
21. Chemical peels in plastic surgery. Rohrich RJ; Hollier LH West J Med; 1995 Jun; 162(6):538-9. PubMed ID: 7618317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Complications of chemical face peeling as evaluated by a questionnaire. Litton C; Trinidad G Plast Reconstr Surg; 1981 Jun; 67(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 7243974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The prevention of cardiac arrhythmias produced in an animal model by the topical application of a phenol preparation in common use for face peeling. Wexler MR; Halon DA; Teitelbaum A; Tadjer G; Peled IJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 1984 Apr; 73(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 6709741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Complications of chemical peeling. Resnik SS; Resnik BI Dermatol Clin; 1995 Apr; 13(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 7600707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Complications of chemical face peeling: prevention and management. Perkins SW Facial Plast Surg; 1995 Jan; 11(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 8995900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Phenol peeling and the history of phenol peeling. Stuzin JM Clin Plast Surg; 1998 Jan; 25(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 9507793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reply to comment to "Chemical peel recipe"-Caution. Phenol is not safe for use for chemo-exfoliation. Chikhalkar S; Vishwanath T; Shende A J Cosmet Dermatol; 2024 Jan; 23(1):358-359. PubMed ID: 37563923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Modified phenol chemical face peels: recognizing the role of application technique. Stone PA; Lefer LG Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 28(1):13-36. PubMed ID: 11248864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cardiac complications in deep chemical peels. Landau M Dermatol Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):190-3; discussion 193. PubMed ID: 17300604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Chemical face peeling. Cortez EA Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1990 Oct; 23(5):947-61. PubMed ID: 2259511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of 70% glycolic peels versus 15% trichloroacetic peels for the treatment of photodamaged facial skin in aging women. Kubiak M; Mucha P; Dębowska R; Rotsztejn H Dermatol Surg; 2014 Aug; 40(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 25068547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Prevention of facial herpetic infections after chemical peel and dermabrasion: new treatment strategies in the prophylaxis of patients undergoing procedures of the perioral area]. Angel S; Boineau-Géniaux D; Salag P; Trepsat F; Chosidow O; Perrot JL; Will F; Grognard C Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1998 Jan; 125(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 9747218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Laryngeal edema as a complication of chemical peel. Klein DR; Little JH Plast Reconstr Surg; 1983 Mar; 71(3):419-20. PubMed ID: 6828569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A second look at chemabrasion. Stagnone JJ; Stagnone GJ J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1982 Aug; 8(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 7119261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reporting a case of peri-orificial herpes of the face due to HSV-1 recurrence: a new form? Hélou J; Maatouk I; Haddad F J Clin Virol; 2014 Nov; 61(3):470-1. PubMed ID: 25176523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the laser and phenol chemical peel in facial skin resurfacing. Langsdon PR; Milburn M; Yarber R Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 126(10):1195-9. PubMed ID: 11031405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]