128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6691131)
1. EPA launches major dioxin attack.
Sun M
Science; 1984 Jan; 223(4631):34. PubMed ID: 6691131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A call for more science in EPA regulations.
Madia WJ
Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5386):45. PubMed ID: 9786793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dioxin report faces scientific gauntlet.
Stone R
Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5179):1650. PubMed ID: 8085150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of risk assessment in the management of environmental exposures to chemical mixtures.
Newill VA
Toxicol Ind Health; 1989 Oct; 5(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 2815099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Evaluation (2001) of the EPA dioxin reassessment.
Paustenbach DJ;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 36(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12460755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dioxin diminishes in market meats.
Lubick N
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(17):5168. PubMed ID: 16999084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A sensitivity analysis using alternative toxic equivalency factors to estimate U.S. dietary exposures to dioxin-like compounds.
Parvez S; Evans AM; Lorber M; Hawkins BS; Swartout JC; Teuschler LK; Rice GE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 23973911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EPA rebuffs challenge to its assessment of dioxin data.
Reichardt T
Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6495):272. PubMed ID: 8090187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisions in cancer policy.
Marshall E
Science; 1983 Apr; 220(4592):36-7. PubMed ID: 6828879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. EPA dioxin reassessment.
Bradfield CA; Gallo MA; Gasiewicz TA; Greenberg RS; Greenlee WF; Margolick J; Mattison DR; Munson P; Neal RA; Okey AB
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5191):1628-9. PubMed ID: 7992038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Superfund strategies and technologies: a role for biotechnology.
Hirschhorn JS
Basic Life Sci; 1988; 45():419-29. PubMed ID: 3178646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toxicology. Just how bad is dioxin?
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5473):1941-4. PubMed ID: 10877704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure assessment techniques used by EPA.
Falco J
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 1983-1984; 21(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 6672222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EPA moves to reassess the risk of dioxin.
Roberts L
Science; 1991 May; 252(5008):911. PubMed ID: 2035022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency procedures and policies to estimate risk of injury to the male reproductive system.
Francis EZ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():3-16; discussion 17-20. PubMed ID: 2755956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EPA to establish incinerator-emission standards.
McLarney VJ
Health Facil Manage; 1989 Sep; 2(9):36. PubMed ID: 10294691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of EPA screening measurements and annual 222Rn concentrations in statewide surveys.
Steck DJ
Health Phys; 1990 Apr; 58(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 2323935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. EPA drafts new research agenda.
Marshall E
Science; 1989 Jun; 244(4910):1253. PubMed ID: 2734607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comments on "Interlaboratory comparison of the determination of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans according to regulatory methods EN 1948 and EPA 1613b" by M. Wilken et al. [Chemosphere 73 (1) (2008) S2-S6].
Tondeur Y
Chemosphere; 2009 May; 75(5):696-698. PubMed ID: 19285706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
